From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: agustin.benito@codethink.co.uk (Agustin Benito Bethencourt) Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 14:40:50 +0100 Subject: [cip-dev] Toolchain Version In-Reply-To: References: <59255F72.1010306@codethink.co.uk> Message-ID: <59258D62.9010903@codethink.co.uk> To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org List-Id: cip-dev.lists.cip-project.org Hi, On 24/05/17 13:34, Chris Paterson wrote: > Hello, > >> From: cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org [mailto:cip-dev- >> bounces at lists.cip-project.org] On Behalf Of Agustin Benito Bethencourt >> Sent: 24 May 2017 11:25 >> Hi, >> >> On 24/05/17 09:16, Chris Paterson wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> Has the project decided upon the compiler/toolchain (and version) that >>> will be used? >> >> No. > > Should it? Yes we should. > I would have thought that as part of CIPs reproducible build/test environment we should be aiming to standardise all tools? We should. > > What toolchain is everyone using at the moment? Good question to start. > > Kind regards, Chris > >> >>> >>> Thanks, Chris >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cip-dev mailing list >>> cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org >>> https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev >>> >> >> -- >> Agustin Benito Bethencourt >> Principal Consultant - FOSS at Codethink agustin.benito at codethink.co.uk >> _______________________________________________ >> cip-dev mailing list >> cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org >> https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev > -- Agustin Benito Bethencourt Principal Consultant - FOSS at Codethink agustin.benito at codethink.co.uk