Re: [PATCH 6.1.y-cip 00/85] soc: renesas: Add RZ/G3E support

Pavel Machek
2025-03-18T19:48:27Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1416 bytes --]

Hi!

> > > > > What is relation between RZ/G3E and rzg2l? Because early patches seem
> > > > > to be for rzg2l support, not RZ/G3E. Splitting those preparations up
> > > > > would be good.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your comment.
> > > >
> > > > RZ/G3E and RZ/G2L SoC have some similar IP's.
> > >
> > > Sorry, to be more precise:
> > > RZ/G3E, RZ/V2H and RZ/G2L SoC have some similar IP's.
> >
> > Thank you. One day I'd like to understand that naming scheme and how
> > different SoCs are related to each other.
> >
> > > > Fully agree.
> > > > I will split backporting in smaller patchset as you suggested.
> > > > Thanks.
> >
> > Thank you. I went through the series up-to 23 or so, and it looked
> > mostly good.
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> I've done some investigation/testing here.
> I'm going to split the big series into the following for now:
>
> - first series:
> serial: sh-sci backpoting patches 65/85 to 76/85
> (required for a minimal boot)
>
> - second series:
> clock + minimal boot support patches 1/85 to 22/85
> (as you suggested)
>
> What do you think? Thanks in advance.
>
> Later:
>
> - pinctrl
> - i2c

That sounds like a good plan.

Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]