Re: [PATCH 6.1.y-cip 00/85] soc: renesas: Add RZ/G3E support

Tommaso Merciai
2025-03-17T14:33:20Z

Hi Pavel,
Thanks for your review.

On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 08:13:50PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > What is relation between RZ/G3E and rzg2l? Because early patches seem
> > > > to be for rzg2l support, not RZ/G3E. Splitting those preparations up
> > > > would be good.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your comment.
> > >
> > > RZ/G3E and RZ/G2L SoC have some similar IP's.
> >
> > Sorry, to be more precise:
> > RZ/G3E, RZ/V2H and RZ/G2L SoC have some similar IP's.
>
> Thank you. One day I'd like to understand that naming scheme and how
> different SoCs are related to each other.
>
> > > Fully agree.
> > > I will split backporting in smaller patchset as you suggested.
> > > Thanks.
>
> Thank you. I went through the series up-to 23 or so, and it looked
> mostly good.

Thanks for your feedback.

I've done some investigation/testing here.
I'm going to split the big series into the following for now:

- first series:
serial: sh-sci backpoting patches 65/85 to 76/85
(required for a minimal boot)

- second series:
clock + minimal boot support patches 1/85 to 22/85
(as you suggested)

What do you think? Thanks in advance.

Later:

- pinctrl
- i2c

>
> Best regards,
> Pavel
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Regards,
Tommaso