* [ANNOUNCE] Release and and v6.1.78-cip15
@ 2024-02-25 23:26 nobuhiro1.iwamatsu
2024-02-26 10:06 ` Chris Paterson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: nobuhiro1.iwamatsu @ 2024-02-25 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cip-dev; +Cc: jan.kiszka, pavel, Chris.Paterson2, uli, masami.ichikawa
Hi,
CIP kernel team has released Linux kernel v6.1.78-cip15.
The linux-6.1.y-cip tree has been updated base version from v6.1.75 to v6.1.78.
And this release adds device versaclock3 fixes for Renesas ARM SoCs.
You can get this release via the git tree at:
v6.1.78-cip15:
repository:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git
branch:
linux-6.1.y-cip
commit hash:
8e0cf035f64a98ea0d7ed2527a547f39866c37ba
Fixed CVEs:
CVE-2024-26581: netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: skip end interval element from gc
CVE-2024-0340: vhost: use kzalloc() instead of kmalloc() followed by memset()
CVE-2024-1086: netfilter: nf_tables: reject QUEUE/DROP verdict parameters
CVE-2024-23849: net/rds: Fix UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in rds_cmsg_recv
added commits:
CIP: Bump version suffix to -cip15 after merge from stable
clk: versaclock3: Drop ret variable
clk: versaclock3: Add missing space between ')' and '{'
clk: versaclock3: Use u8 return type for get_parent() callback
clk: versaclock3: Avoid unnecessary padding
clk: versaclock3: Update vc3_get_div() to avoid divide by zero
arm64: defconfig: Enable Renesas VersaClock 3 clock generator config
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* RE: [ANNOUNCE] Release and and v6.1.78-cip15
2024-02-25 23:26 [ANNOUNCE] Release and and v6.1.78-cip15 nobuhiro1.iwamatsu
@ 2024-02-26 10:06 ` Chris Paterson
2024-02-26 12:05 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Paterson @ 2024-02-26 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp, cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org
Cc: jan.kiszka@siemens.com, pavel@denx.de, uli@fpond.eu,
masami.ichikawa@cybertrust.co.jp
Hello,
> From: nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp
> <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 11:27 PM
>
> Hi,
>
> CIP kernel team has released Linux kernel v6.1.78-cip15.
> The linux-6.1.y-cip tree has been updated base version from v6.1.75 to
> v6.1.78.
> And this release adds device versaclock3 fixes for Renesas ARM SoCs.
>
> You can get this release via the git tree at:
>
> v6.1.78-cip15:
> repository:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git
> branch:
> linux-6.1.y-cip
> commit hash:
> 8e0cf035f64a98ea0d7ed2527a547f39866c37ba
> Fixed CVEs:
> CVE-2024-26581: netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: skip end interval element
> from gc
> CVE-2024-0340: vhost: use kzalloc() instead of kmalloc() followed by
> memset()
> CVE-2024-1086: netfilter: nf_tables: reject QUEUE/DROP verdict
> parameters
> CVE-2024-23849: net/rds: Fix UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in
> rds_cmsg_recv
> added commits:
> CIP: Bump version suffix to -cip15 after merge from stable
> clk: versaclock3: Drop ret variable
> clk: versaclock3: Add missing space between ')' and '{'
> clk: versaclock3: Use u8 return type for get_parent() callback
> clk: versaclock3: Avoid unnecessary padding
> clk: versaclock3: Update vc3_get_div() to avoid divide by zero
> arm64: defconfig: Enable Renesas VersaClock 3 clock generator config
Test results:
- Dashboard: https://squad.ciplatform.org/linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip/build/6.1.78-cip15_8e0cf035f/
- Results comparison with previous release: https://squad.ciplatform.org/_/comparebuilds/?project=linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip&baseline=6.1.75-cip14_f555c0a7f&target=6.1.78-cip15_8e0cf035f&comparison_type=test
- Summary: No new regressions
Kind regards, Chris
>
> Best regards,
> Nobuhiro
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release and and v6.1.78-cip15
2024-02-26 10:06 ` Chris Paterson
@ 2024-02-26 12:05 ` Pavel Machek
2024-02-26 12:18 ` Chris Paterson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-02-26 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Paterson
Cc: nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp, cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org,
jan.kiszka@siemens.com, pavel@denx.de, uli@fpond.eu,
masami.ichikawa@cybertrust.co.jp
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1136 bytes --]
Hi!
> Test results:
> - Dashboard: https://squad.ciplatform.org/linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip/build/6.1.78-cip15_8e0cf035f/
> - Results comparison with previous release: https://squad.ciplatform.org/_/comparebuilds/?project=linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip&baseline=6.1.75-cip14_f555c0a7f&target=6.1.78-cip15_8e0cf035f&comparison_type=test
> - Summary: No new regressions
Ok, so I'm looking at squad to see if it is feasible to decode the
results.
I assume testing starts automatically at the push?
I see "Test jobs progress 31 / 31 (100%)", but the bar above it is
partly red. What does the red part mean?
It lists incomplete test jobs at
https://squad.ciplatform.org/linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip/build/6.1.78-cip15_8e0cf035f/testjobs/
. Is that expected? How should we deal with those?
Could we add big, green "This is okay to release" text somewhere, that
tells me that everything is okay without going through all the
details?
Thansk and best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: [ANNOUNCE] Release and and v6.1.78-cip15
2024-02-26 12:05 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-02-26 12:18 ` Chris Paterson
2024-03-01 11:41 ` squad was " Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Paterson @ 2024-02-26 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek
Cc: nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp, cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org,
jan.kiszka@siemens.com, uli@fpond.eu,
masami.ichikawa@cybertrust.co.jp, van Buuren Sietze (XC-CT/EMT2)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3414 bytes --]
Hello Pavel,
> From: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 12:05 PM
>
> Hi!
>
> > Test results:
> > - Dashboard: https://squad.ciplatform.org/linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-<https://squad.ciplatform.org/linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip/build/6.1.78-cip15_8e0cf035f/>
> cip/build/6.1.78-cip15_8e0cf035f/<https://squad.ciplatform.org/linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip/build/6.1.78-cip15_8e0cf035f/>
> > - Results comparison with previous release:
> https://squad.ciplatform.org/_/comparebuilds/?project=linux-cip/linux-<https://squad.ciplatform.org/_/comparebuilds/?project=linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip&baseline=6.1.75-cip14_f555c0a7f&target=6.1.78-cip15_8e0cf035f&comparison_type=test>
> 6.1.y-cip&baseline=6.1.75-cip14_f555c0a7f&target=6.1.78-<https://squad.ciplatform.org/_/comparebuilds/?project=linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip&baseline=6.1.75-cip14_f555c0a7f&target=6.1.78-cip15_8e0cf035f&comparison_type=test>
> cip15_8e0cf035f&comparison_type=test<https://squad.ciplatform.org/_/comparebuilds/?project=linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip&baseline=6.1.75-cip14_f555c0a7f&target=6.1.78-cip15_8e0cf035f&comparison_type=test>
> > - Summary: No new regressions
>
> Ok, so I'm looking at squad to see if it is feasible to decode the
> results.
>
> I assume testing starts automatically at the push?
>
> I see "Test jobs progress 31 / 31 (100%)", but the bar above it is
> partly red. What does the red part mean?
One of the LAVA jobs failed to complete.
>
> It lists incomplete test jobs at
> https://squad.ciplatform.org/linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip/build/6.1.78-<https://squad.ciplatform.org/linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip/build/6.1.78-cip15_8e0cf035f/testjobs/>
> cip15_8e0cf035f/testjobs/<https://squad.ciplatform.org/linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip/build/6.1.78-cip15_8e0cf035f/testjobs/>
> . Is that expected? How should we deal with those?
If the "incomplete" LAVA job has a green ticket next to it (as in this case), the job has already been resubmitted and successfully run again.
If there is a red cross, a LAVA job failed to complete and hasn't been resubmitted yet.
SQUAD admins (me & Sietze) can resubmit these LAVA jobs directly from SQUAD, then SQUAD automatically keeps track of it all.
>
> Could we add big, green "This is okay to release" text somewhere, that
> tells me that everything is okay without going through all the
> details?
There are two options.
1) You can look at the top level (https://squad.ciplatform.org/linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip/):
[cid:image001.png@01DA68AD.90D6AD30]
If in the circled section it is all green and “pass” – there are no issues.
If in the circled section there is a red “fail” bit, there have been builds or tests that have failed.
2) Look at an individual build (https://squad.ciplatform.org/linux-cip/linux-6.1.y-cip/build/6.1.78-cip15_8e0cf035f/)
If you scroll to the bottom there is a “Test results section”.
By default a “failures only” tick box is selected.
If there are any build or test failures then something will be shown here.
Or you can unselect the “failures only” tick box and you’ll get a view of all of the passed builds/tests as well:
[cid:image002.png@01DA68AD.E510B800]
Again, there will be red “fail” items here if there are issues.
Hopefully that clarifies things a bit.
Kind regards, Chris
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 9304 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: image001.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 23959 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: image002.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 26221 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* squad was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release and and v6.1.78-cip15
2024-02-26 12:18 ` Chris Paterson
@ 2024-03-01 11:41 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-03-01 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Paterson
Cc: Pavel Machek, nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp,
cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com,
uli@fpond.eu, masami.ichikawa@cybertrust.co.jp,
van Buuren Sietze (XC-CT/EMT2)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1036 bytes --]
Hi!
> > . Is that expected? How should we deal with those?
>
>
>
> If the "incomplete" LAVA job has a green ticket next to it (as in this case), the job has already been resubmitted and successfully run again.
>
> If there is a red cross, a LAVA job failed to complete and hasn't been resubmitted yet.
>
> SQUAD admins (me & Sietze) can resubmit these LAVA jobs directly from SQUAD, then SQUAD automatically keeps track of it all.
>
Still looking at Squad. I submitted test merge to LAVA, and it is now
being tested at
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/linux-cip/tree/ci/pavel/linux-test
. Where can I find it in SQUAD?
And while browsing around, I stepped on this:
https://squad.ciplatform.org/linux-cip/
There is still lot of skips and fails there. The 5.10 ones are from 9
hours ago. What is going on there?
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-01 11:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-25 23:26 [ANNOUNCE] Release and and v6.1.78-cip15 nobuhiro1.iwamatsu
2024-02-26 10:06 ` Chris Paterson
2024-02-26 12:05 ` Pavel Machek
2024-02-26 12:18 ` Chris Paterson
2024-03-01 11:41 ` squad was " Pavel Machek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox