From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [GFS2] Replace revoke structure with bufdata structure
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 11:30:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1188729049.9929.4.camel@quoit> (raw)
Hi,
Both the revoke structure and the bufdata structure are quite similar.
They are basically small tags which are put on lists. In addition to
which the revoke structure is always allocated when there is a bufdata
structure which is (or can be) freed. As such it should be possible to
reduce the number of frees and allocations by using the same structure
for both purposes.
This patch is the first step along that path. It replaces existing uses
of the revoke structure with the bufdata structure.
Steve.
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/incore.h b/fs/gfs2/incore.h
index 388dc1b..8aa5780 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/incore.h
+++ b/fs/gfs2/incore.h
@@ -114,7 +114,13 @@ struct gfs2_bufdata {
struct buffer_head *bd_bh;
struct gfs2_glock *bd_gl;
- struct list_head bd_list_tr;
+ union {
+ struct list_head list_tr;
+ u64 blkno;
+ } u;
+#define bd_list_tr u.list_tr
+#define bd_blkno u.blkno
+
struct gfs2_log_element bd_le;
struct gfs2_ail *bd_ail;
@@ -298,11 +304,6 @@ struct gfs2_file {
struct gfs2_holder f_fl_gh;
};
-struct gfs2_revoke {
- struct gfs2_log_element rv_le;
- u64 rv_blkno;
-};
-
struct gfs2_revoke_replay {
struct list_head rr_list;
u64 rr_blkno;
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/lops.c b/fs/gfs2/lops.c
index 7e2d4e6..cf6fe36 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/lops.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/lops.c
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static void revoke_lo_before_commit(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
struct buffer_head *bh;
unsigned int offset;
struct list_head *head = &sdp->sd_log_le_revoke;
- struct gfs2_revoke *rv;
+ struct gfs2_bufdata *bd;
if (!sdp->sd_log_num_revoke)
return;
@@ -376,8 +376,8 @@ static void revoke_lo_before_commit(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
offset = sizeof(struct gfs2_log_descriptor);
while (!list_empty(head)) {
- rv = list_entry(head->next, struct gfs2_revoke, rv_le.le_list);
- list_del_init(&rv->rv_le.le_list);
+ bd = list_entry(head->next, struct gfs2_bufdata, bd_le.le_list);
+ list_del_init(&bd->bd_le.le_list);
sdp->sd_log_num_revoke--;
if (offset + sizeof(u64) > sdp->sd_sb.sb_bsize) {
@@ -392,8 +392,8 @@ static void revoke_lo_before_commit(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
offset = sizeof(struct gfs2_meta_header);
}
- *(__be64 *)(bh->b_data + offset) = cpu_to_be64(rv->rv_blkno);
- kfree(rv);
+ *(__be64 *)(bh->b_data + offset) = cpu_to_be64(bd->bd_blkno);
+ kfree(bd);
offset += sizeof(u64);
}
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/trans.c b/fs/gfs2/trans.c
index f8dabf8..eadf96e 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/trans.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/trans.c
@@ -144,23 +144,23 @@ void gfs2_trans_add_bh(struct gfs2_glock *gl, struct buffer_head *bh, int meta)
void gfs2_trans_add_revoke(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, u64 blkno)
{
- struct gfs2_revoke *rv = kmalloc(sizeof(struct gfs2_revoke),
- GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);
- lops_init_le(&rv->rv_le, &gfs2_revoke_lops);
- rv->rv_blkno = blkno;
- lops_add(sdp, &rv->rv_le);
+ struct gfs2_bufdata *bd = kmalloc(sizeof(struct gfs2_bufdata),
+ GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);
+ lops_init_le(&bd->bd_le, &gfs2_revoke_lops);
+ bd->bd_blkno = blkno;
+ lops_add(sdp, &bd->bd_le);
}
void gfs2_trans_add_unrevoke(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, u64 blkno)
{
- struct gfs2_revoke *rv;
+ struct gfs2_bufdata *bd;
int found = 0;
gfs2_log_lock(sdp);
- list_for_each_entry(rv, &sdp->sd_log_le_revoke, rv_le.le_list) {
- if (rv->rv_blkno == blkno) {
- list_del(&rv->rv_le.le_list);
+ list_for_each_entry(bd, &sdp->sd_log_le_revoke, bd_le.le_list) {
+ if (bd->bd_blkno == blkno) {
+ list_del(&bd->bd_le.le_list);
gfs2_assert_withdraw(sdp, sdp->sd_log_num_revoke);
sdp->sd_log_num_revoke--;
found = 1;
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ void gfs2_trans_add_unrevoke(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, u64 blkno)
if (found) {
struct gfs2_trans *tr = current->journal_info;
- kfree(rv);
+ kfree(bd);
tr->tr_num_revoke_rm++;
}
}
reply other threads:[~2007-09-02 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1188729049.9929.4.camel@quoit \
--to=swhiteho@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).