From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] [GFS2] bz 276631 : GFS2: chmod hung - TRY 2
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:26:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1189772802.1068.42.camel@quoit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1189742683.5632.13.camel@technetium.msp.redhat.com>
Hi,
Now in the -nmw git tree. Thanks,
Steve.
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 23:04 -0500, Bob Peterson wrote:
> Josef's right--my bad. Here is the corrected patch for 276631.
>
> The problem boiled down to a race between the gdlm_init_threads()
> function initializing thread1 and its setting of blist = 1.
> Essentially, "if (current == ls->thread1)" was checked by the thread
> before the thread creator set ls->thread1.
>
> Since thread1 is the only thread who is allowed to work on the
> blocking queue, and since neither thread thought it was thread1, no one
> was working on the queue. So everything just sat.
>
> This patch reuses the ls->async_lock spin_lock to fix the race,
> and it fixes the problem. I've done more than 2000 iterations of the
> loop that was recreating the failure and it seems to work.
>
> Dave Teigland brought up the question of whether we should do this
> another way. For example, by checking for the task name "lock_dlm1"
> instead. I'm open to opinions.
> --
> Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
> --
> diff -pur a/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c b/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c
> --- a/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c 2007-09-13 17:33:58.000000000 -0500
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c 2007-09-13 22:47:14.000000000 -0500
> @@ -279,8 +279,10 @@ static int gdlm_thread(void *data)
> /* Only thread1 is allowed to do blocking callbacks since gfs
> may wait for a completion callback within a blocking cb. */
>
> + spin_lock(&ls->async_lock);
> if (current == ls->thread1)
> blist = 1;
> + spin_unlock(&ls->async_lock);
>
> while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> @@ -338,10 +340,12 @@ int gdlm_init_threads(struct gdlm_ls *ls
> struct task_struct *p;
> int error;
>
> + spin_lock(&ls->async_lock);
> p = kthread_run(gdlm_thread, ls, "lock_dlm1");
> error = IS_ERR(p);
> if (error) {
> log_error("can't start lock_dlm1 thread %d", error);
> + spin_unlock(&ls->async_lock);
> return error;
> }
> ls->thread1 = p;
> @@ -351,9 +355,11 @@ int gdlm_init_threads(struct gdlm_ls *ls
> if (error) {
> log_error("can't start lock_dlm2 thread %d", error);
> kthread_stop(ls->thread1);
> + spin_unlock(&ls->async_lock);
> return error;
> }
> ls->thread2 = p;
> + spin_unlock(&ls->async_lock);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-14 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-14 4:04 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] [GFS2] bz 276631 : GFS2: chmod hung - TRY 2 Bob Peterson
2007-09-14 12:26 ` Steven Whitehouse [this message]
2007-09-14 13:37 ` David Teigland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1189772802.1068.42.camel@quoit \
--to=swhiteho@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).