From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lon Hohberger Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Cluster-devel] RCS sandbox In-Reply-To: <46FC8473.1060008@ubuntu.com> References: <46FC8473.1060008@ubuntu.com> Message-ID: <1190991866.10032.8.camel@ayanami.boston.devel.redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 06:34 +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > Hi everybody, > > for sometime now there has been a strong indication (on IRC) that the project > should move away from CVS to land on a more modern RCS. > Before you start a flame war that foo is better than bar and so on, let me > explain that we all understand the RCS of choice is always binded to people > personal tastes and it is basically impossible to make everybody happy. I would vote for Mercurial if I had a say. However, I'm sure someone with a far stronger opinion would complain, so, forget I said anything. In any case, I would like to recommend restricting the possible choices to: * git * svn * mercurial (hg) Rationale: That's what closely-related projects use (Linux, openais, Linux-HA). -- Lon