From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:44:34 +0000
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: gfs2_fh_to_parent() array overflow
In-Reply-To: <20080213213112.GU3383@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
References: <20071024162626.GJ30533@stusta.de>
	<20071027210039.GA2688@lst.de> <1193649081.1068.462.camel@quoit>
	<20080213213112.GU3383@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Message-ID: <1202985874.22038.455.camel@quoit>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 23:31 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:11:21AM +0000, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 23:00 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 06:26:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > The Coverity checker spotted the following array overflow caused by
> > > > commit 34c0d154243dd913c5690ae6ceb9557017429b9c:
> > > 
> > > The line is a left-over from times when gfs stored the mode of the
> > > inode in the file handle.  It can simply be deleted.  Steve, do you
> > > want a patch for that or could you commit that one-liner directly?
> > > 
> > 
> > I'm just back from holiday this morning and this is looking a bit more
> > complicated than that... give me a day or two and I'll try and come up
> > with a solution,
> 
> This issue is still present in 2.6.25-rc1.
> 
Yes, it seems to have slipped off my list somehow... I've opened a bz
(#432775 at bugzilla.redhat.com) to ensure that it doesn't get missed
again,

Steve.