From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc - A. Dahlhaus [ Administration | Westermann GmbH ] Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:26:35 +0200 Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: gfs1 for 2.6.30 In-Reply-To: <1247510334.1745.2.camel@daitarn-fedora.int.fabbione.net> References: <1247087412.7941.37.camel@cerberus.int.fabbione.net> <1247507081.28577.9.camel@marc> <1247510334.1745.2.camel@daitarn-fedora.int.fabbione.net> Message-ID: <1247556395.7222.6.camel@marc> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am Montag, den 13.07.2009, 20:38 +0200 schrieb Fabio M. Di Nitto: > On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 19:44 +0200, Marc - A. Dahlhaus [ Administration | > Westermann GmbH ] wrote: > > Hello Fabio, > > > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2009, 23:10 +0200 schrieb Fabio M. Di Nitto: > > > The cluster team and its community are proud to announce the 3.0.0 final > > > release from the STABLE3 branch. > > > > > > "And now what?" > > > > > > The STABLE3 branch will continue to receive bug fixes and improvements > > > as feedback from our community and users will flow in. > > > Regular update releases will be available to sync with corosync/openais > > > releases and new kernels (for gfs1-kernel module). > > > > > > In order to build the 3.0.0 release you will need: > > > > > > - corosync 1.0.0 > > > - openais 1.0.0 > > > - linux kernel 2.6.29 > > > > are there any (even untested) patches for kernel 2.6.30 gfs1 out there? > > Not that I am aware of. The gfs team should know when it will be > available. > > > > > We plan to move from stable2 to stable3 on our test-systems soonish and > > want to move up to 2.6.30 for gfs2 fixes but still want use gfs1 for > > performance comparsion... > > Understood. The gfs team did prefer to release gfs1 at 2.6.29 for 3.0.0 > but there should be an update soon. I am not aware of a specific time > yet tho as I left for vacation shortly after 3.0 release ;) Enjoy it. :) Thanks for the clarification. Marc