From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Whitehouse Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:05:19 +0100 Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: move gfs2 tracepoints to inclue/trace/events dir In-Reply-To: <20091009160115.GA2647@redhat.com> References: <20091009160115.GA2647@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1255104319.6052.558.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:01 -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > hi, > > I'd like to move the gfs2 tracepoints to the the common > include/trace/events directory along with all of the other trace events. > It makes understanding what tracepoints are available easier, and I see > no reason why gfs2 should be different. For example, 'ext4.h' is already > in the include/trace/events directory. > > thanks, > > -Jason > I've no objection to that, it sounds like a good plan. Should I stick this in the GFS2 tree, or would you rather keep it in the trace tree? I was thinking probably the GFS2 tree would be better as it reduces the chances of any future conflicts. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Baron > Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse Steve. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Whitehouse Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:05:19 +0100 Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: move gfs2 tracepoints to inclue/trace/events dir In-Reply-To: <20091009160115.GA2647@redhat.com> References: <20091009160115.GA2647@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1255104319.6052.558.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20091009160519.mazYFiNxIWDn6YwY0tYKriDrE5tZJV6HzsTiP1N6Qn4@z> Hi, On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:01 -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > hi, > > I'd like to move the gfs2 tracepoints to the the common > include/trace/events directory along with all of the other trace events. > It makes understanding what tracepoints are available easier, and I see > no reason why gfs2 should be different. For example, 'ext4.h' is already > in the include/trace/events directory. > > thanks, > > -Jason > I've no objection to that, it sounds like a good plan. Should I stick this in the GFS2 tree, or would you rather keep it in the trace tree? I was thinking probably the GFS2 tree would be better as it reduces the chances of any future conflicts. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Baron > Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse Steve. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/