From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Dake <sdake@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:12:30 -0700
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: [Openais] [RFC] Proposal to align autotool
	versions
In-Reply-To: <4B0BE0C6.4000702@redhat.com>
References: <4B0BE0C6.4000702@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1259079150.2822.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 14:33 +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> I just completed testing of autotools in F13/rawhide and they seem to
> fulfill perfectly what we need so far.
> 
> Fedora13 has:
> 
> libtool 2.2.6 (doesn?t carry the bug for which we were forcing 2.2.7)
> autoconf 2.64 (higher than what we require now)
> automake 1.11/m4/pkg-config in more than recent enough versions.
> 

There is no motivation (ie bugs) to change the dependency to a later
version  autoconf for corosync.


> corosync/openais will eventually get libtool support.
> cluster-stable3 autotool implementation is eventually on the schedule.
> cluster/master trees are already ported.
> 
> My suggestion is simply to use those versions across the projects so
> that developers will not require any longer to manually build autotools
> and can start easily testing again master trees.
> 
> Please ACK/NACK.
> 
> Fabio
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openais mailing list
> Openais at lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais