* [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/2] gfs:remove a warning in gfs2_lookup_by_inum()
[not found] <1302489770-31552-1-git-send-email-panweiping3@gmail.com>
@ 2011-04-13 10:11 ` Steven Whitehouse
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Steven Whitehouse @ 2011-04-13 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Hi,
Thanks for the patch, however a fix for this is already in the GFS2 -nmw
git tree,
Steve.
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 10:42 +0800, Weiping Pan(???) wrote:
> /home/pwp/mysvn/linux/linux-2.6/fs/gfs2/inode.c: In function
> ?gfs2_lookup_by_inum?: /home/pwp/mysvn/linux/linux-2.6/fs/gfs2/inode.c:188:16:
> warning: ?inode? may be used uninitialized in this function
>
> Signed-off-by: Weiping Pan(???) <panweiping3@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/gfs2/inode.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/inode.c b/fs/gfs2/inode.c
> index 97d54a2..5b937c6 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/inode.c
> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ struct inode *gfs2_lookup_by_inum(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, u64 no_addr,
> {
> struct super_block *sb = sdp->sd_vfs;
> struct gfs2_holder i_gh;
> - struct inode *inode;
> + struct inode *inode = NULL;
> int error;
>
> error = gfs2_glock_nq_num(sdp, no_addr, &gfs2_inode_glops,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread