From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Whitehouse Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 16:30:22 +0100 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5 13/21] evm: add evm_inode_post_init call in gfs2 In-Reply-To: <1305557115-15652-14-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1305557115-15652-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1305557115-15652-14-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: <1305559822.2855.14.camel@menhir> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:45 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > After creating the initial LSM security extended attribute, call > evm_inode_post_init_security() to create the 'security.evm' > extended attribute. > > Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar > --- > fs/gfs2/inode.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++--------- > 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > [snip] > + struct xattr lsm_xattr; > + struct xattr evm_xattr; > > err = security_inode_init_security(&ip->i_inode, &dip->i_inode, qstr, > - &name, &value, &len); > + &lsm_xattr.name, &lsm_xattr.value, > + &lsm_xattr.value_len); > > if (err) { > if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) > @@ -780,11 +781,20 @@ static int gfs2_security_init(struct gfs2_inode *dip, struct gfs2_inode *ip, > return err; > } > > - err = __gfs2_xattr_set(&ip->i_inode, name, value, len, 0, > - GFS2_EATYPE_SECURITY); > - kfree(value); > - kfree(name); > - > + err = __gfs2_xattr_set(&ip->i_inode, lsm_xattr.name, lsm_xattr.value, > + lsm_xattr.value_len, 0, GFS2_EATYPE_SECURITY); > + if (err < 0) > + goto out; > + err = evm_inode_post_init_security(&ip->i_inode, &lsm_xattr, > + &evm_xattr); > + if (err) > + goto out; > + err = __gfs2_xattr_set(&ip->i_inode, evm_xattr.name, evm_xattr.value, > + evm_xattr.value_len, 0, GFS2_EATYPE_SECURITY); > + kfree(evm_xattr.value); > +out: > + kfree(lsm_xattr.name); > + kfree(lsm_xattr.value); > return err; > } > Just wondering whether we could have a single call to the security subsystem which returns a vector of xattrs rather than having to call two different functions? Steve.