From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Whitehouse Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:41:50 +0000 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] gfs2-utils: Add gfs2-cluster systemd unit In-Reply-To: <4EE762E4.7010501@redhat.com> References: <1323786024-6233-1-git-send-email-anprice@redhat.com> <4EE762E4.7010501@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1323787310.2725.11.camel@menhir> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 15:36 +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: > On 12/13/2011 3:20 PM, Andrew Price wrote: > > Adds a systemd unit file to start gfs_controld at the correct point in > > the boot sequence. I've tested this as much as I can on Fedora 16 but it > > may require some more tweaking once the init scripts for cman, clvmd, > > etc. have been migrated. The gfs2 init script has not been migrated as > > systemd should now handle mounting of gfs2 file systems specially, after > > remote-fs-pre.target. > > cman will not migrate to systemd, but I am a bit puzzled because I > thought that gfs_controld will go away? Is there a point to go through > this transition at all? > > Fabio > I think that is unlikely to happen before f17 and we need to migrate before then I think. So its a question of timing. We'll probably have to keep gfs_controld for a few fedora versions yet bearing in mind that the kernel patches are not upstream yet. We are still carrying mount.gfs2 in the utils, even though that has not been required for some time, and is not currently part of the fedora package, for example. I'm expecting that we'll have to do the same with gfs_controld, Steve.