From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:30:36 +0100
Subject: [Cluster-devel] seq_file: Use larger buffer to reduce time
	traversing lists
In-Reply-To: <1338563900.2760.1529.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
References: <1338547193.2708.16.camel@menhir>
	<1338552626.2760.1510.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1338553486.2708.25.camel@menhir>
	<1338554890.2760.1517.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1338556468.2708.41.camel@menhir>
	<1338557229.2760.1520.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1338560283.2708.59.camel@menhir>
	<1338562627.2760.1526.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1338562897.2760.1528.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1338563900.2760.1529.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Message-ID: <1338564636.2708.75.camel@menhir>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 17:18 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 17:01 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> > All unix sockets are linked into a single list, no hash table, so its
> > not very easy right now.
> > 
> 
> Oops, there is a hash table, so patch is coming ;)
> 
> 

The only reason that I looked at the unix sockets was that Nate Straz,
who originally reported the issue to me had sent me a test program for
unix sockets which he wrote in response to one of your earlier emails.
So I converted it to tcp just to do that quick test,

Steve.