From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] GFS2: Don't brelse rgrp buffer_heads every allocation
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 10:45:53 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1353222669.13489616.1433861153801.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55758830.6080405@redhat.com>
----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
>
>
> On 05/06/15 15:49, Bob Peterson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch allows the block allocation code to retain the buffers
> > for the resource groups so they don't need to be re-read from buffer
> > cache with every request. This is a performance improvement that's
> > especially noticeable when resource groups are very large. For
> > example, with 2GB resource groups and 4K blocks, there can be 33
> > blocks for every resource group. This patch allows those 33 buffers
> > to be kept around and not read in and thrown away with every
> > operation. The buffers are released when the resource group is
> > either synced or invalidated.
> The blocks should be cached between operations, so this should only be
> resulting in a skip of the look up of the cached block, and no changes
> to the actual I/O. Does that mean that grab_cache_page() is slow I
> wonder? Or is this an issue of going around the retry loop due to lack
> of memory at some stage?
>
> How does this interact with the rgrplvb support? I'd guess that with
> that turned on, this is no longer an issue, because we'd only read in
> the blocks for the rgrps that we are actually going to use?
>
>
>
> Steve.
Hi,
If you compare the two vmstat outputs in the bugzilla #1154782, you'll
see no significant difference in memory usage nor cpu usage. So I assume
the page lookup is the "slow" part; not because it's such a slow thing
but because it's done 33 times per read-reference-invalidate (33 pages
to look up per rgrp).
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-09 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1673564717.11791069.1433515261791.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
2015-06-05 14:49 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] GFS2: Don't brelse rgrp buffer_heads every allocation Bob Peterson
2015-06-08 12:18 ` Steven Whitehouse
2015-06-09 14:45 ` Bob Peterson [this message]
2015-06-10 10:30 ` Steven Whitehouse
2015-06-12 19:50 ` Bob Peterson
2015-06-15 11:18 ` Steven Whitehouse
2015-06-15 13:56 ` Bob Peterson
2015-06-15 14:26 ` Steven Whitehouse
2015-06-15 14:43 ` Bob Peterson
2015-06-16 10:19 ` Steven Whitehouse
2015-06-16 13:54 ` Bob Peterson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1353222669.13489616.1433861153801.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).