cluster-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rpeterso@redhat.com <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 37/42] fsck.gfs2: don't invalidate files with duplicate data block refs
Date: Mon,  8 Apr 2013 07:41:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365432074-17615-38-git-send-email-rpeterso@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365432074-17615-1-git-send-email-rpeterso@redhat.com>

From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>

Before this patch, whenever pass1 encountered a duplicated data block
pointer, it would mark the file as invalid. But if reason the block
was duplicated was due to a different bad inode, the inode with the
valid data block reference was still punished and deleted.

This patch adds an additional check to see if the previous reference
to the data block was as a _valid_ metadata block. If the previous
reference was as metadata, and the metadata checked out okay, then
it can't possibly be a data block for the second reference. In that
case, we know for a fact that the second reference is invalid. But
if the previous reference was also as data, the inode might be okay
and duplicate resolving in pass1b might sort it out and leave this
inode as the only valid reference. In that case, we should treat the
inode as valid, not invalid. So this patch basically treats duplicate
data block references as "innocent until proven guilty" rather than
just the opposite.

rhbz#902920
---
 gfs2/fsck/pass1.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gfs2/fsck/pass1.c b/gfs2/fsck/pass1.c
index 12c5795..74d5fb6 100644
--- a/gfs2/fsck/pass1.c
+++ b/gfs2/fsck/pass1.c
@@ -425,18 +425,32 @@ static int check_data(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t metablock,
 			log_err(_("from metadata block %llu (0x%llx)\n"),
 				(unsigned long long)metablock,
 				(unsigned long long)metablock);
-
+				
+		if (q >= gfs2_indir_blk && q <= gfs2_jdata) {
+			log_info(_("The block was processed earlier as valid "
+				   "metadata, so it can't possibly be "
+				   "data.\n"));
+			/* We still need to add a duplicate record here because
+			   when check_metatree tries to delete the inode, we
+			   can't have the "undo" functions freeing the block
+			   out from other the original referencing inode. */
+			add_duplicate_ref(ip, block, ref_as_data, 0,
+					  INODE_VALID);
+			return 1;
+		}
 		if (q != gfs2_meta_inval) {
 			log_info( _("Seems to be a normal duplicate; I'll "
 				    "sort it out in pass1b.\n"));
 			add_duplicate_ref(ip, block, ref_as_data, 0,
 					  INODE_VALID);
-			return 1;
+			/* This inode references the block as data. So if this
+			   all is validated, we want to keep this count. */
+			return 0;
 		}
 		log_info( _("The block was invalid as metadata but might be "
 			    "okay as data.  I'll sort it out in pass1b.\n"));
 		add_duplicate_ref(ip, block, ref_as_data, 0, INODE_VALID);
-		return 1;
+		return 0;
 	}
 	/* In gfs1, rgrp indirect blocks are marked in the bitmap as "meta".
 	   In gfs2, "meta" is only for dinodes. So here we dummy up the
-- 
1.7.11.7



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-08 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-08 14:40 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/42] fsck.gfs2 fixes and improvements rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 01/42] libgfs2: externalize dir_split_leaf rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 02/42] libgfs2: allow dir_split_leaf to receive a leaf buffer rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 03/42] libgfs2: let dir_split_leaf receive a "broken" lindex rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 04/42] fsck.gfs2: Move function find_free_blk to util.c rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 05/42] fsck.gfs2: Split out function to make sure lost+found exists rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 06/42] fsck.gfs2: Check for formal inode mismatch when adding to lost+found rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 07/42] fsck.gfs2: shorten some debug messages in lost+found rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 08/42] fsck.gfs2: Move basic directory entry checks to separate function rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 09/42] fsck.gfs2: Add formal inode check to basic dirent checks rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 10/42] fsck.gfs2: Add new function to check dir hash tables rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 11/42] fsck.gfs2: Special case '..' when processing bad formal inode number rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 12/42] fsck.gfs2: Move function to read directory hash table to util.c rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 13/42] fsck.gfs2: Misc cleanups rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 14/42] fsck.gfs2: Verify dirent hash values correspond to proper leaf block rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 15/42] fsck.gfs2: re-read hash table if directory height or depth changes rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 16/42] fsck.gfs2: fix leaf blocks, don't try to patch the hash table rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 17/42] fsck.gfs2: check leaf depth when validating leaf blocks rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 18/42] fsck.gfs2: small cleanups rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 19/42] fsck.gfs2: reprocess inodes when blocks are added rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 20/42] fsck.gfs2: Remove redundant leaf depth check rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 21/42] fsck.gfs2: link dinodes that only have extended attribute problems rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 22/42] fsck.gfs2: Add clarifying message to duplicate processing rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 23/42] fsck.gfs2: separate function to calculate metadata block header size rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 24/42] fsck.gfs2: Rework the "undo" functions rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 25/42] fsck.gfs2: Check for interrupt when resolving duplicates rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 26/42] fsck.gfs2: Consistent naming of struct duptree variables rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 27/42] fsck.gfs2: Keep proper counts when duplicates are found rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 28/42] fsck.gfs2: print metadata block reference on data errors rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 29/42] fsck.gfs2: print block count values when fixing them rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 30/42] fsck.gfs2: Do not invalidate metablocks of dinodes with invalid mode rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 31/42] fsck.gfs2: Log when unrecoverable data block errors are encountered rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 32/42] fsck.gfs2: don't remove buffers from the list when errors are found rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 33/42] fsck.gfs2: Don't flag GFS1 non-dinode blocks as duplicates rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 34/42] fsck.gfs2: externalize check_leaf rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 35/42] fsck.gfs2 pass2: check leaf blocks when fixing hash table rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 36/42] fsck.gfs2: standardize check_metatree return codes rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:41 ` rpeterso [this message]
2013-04-08 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 38/42] fsck.gfs2: check for duplicate first references rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 39/42] fsck.gfs2: When flagging a duplicate reference, show valid or invalid rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 40/42] fsck.gfs2: major duplicate reference reform rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 41/42] fsck.gfs2: Remove all bad eattr blocks rpeterso
2013-04-08 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 42/42] fsck.gfs2: Remove unused variable rpeterso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1365432074-17615-38-git-send-email-rpeterso@redhat.com \
    --to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).