cluster-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1 03/11] locks: comment cleanups and clarifications
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 23:07:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1370056054-25449-4-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370056054-25449-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
---
 fs/locks.c         |   24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/fs.h |    6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index e3140b8..a7d2253 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -150,6 +150,16 @@ static int target_leasetype(struct file_lock *fl)
 int leases_enable = 1;
 int lease_break_time = 45;
 
+/*
+ * The i_flock list is ordered by:
+ *
+ * 1) lock type -- FL_LEASEs first, then FL_FLOCK, and finally FL_POSIX
+ * 2) lock owner
+ * 3) lock range start
+ * 4) lock range end
+ *
+ * Obviously, the last two criteria only matter for POSIX locks.
+ */
 #define for_each_lock(inode, lockp) \
 	for (lockp = &inode->i_flock; *lockp != NULL; lockp = &(*lockp)->fl_next)
 
@@ -806,6 +816,11 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request, str
 	}
 
 	lock_flocks();
+	/*
+	 * New lock request. Walk all POSIX locks and look for conflicts. If
+	 * there are any, either return -EAGAIN or put the request on the
+	 * blocker's list of waiters.
+	 */
 	if (request->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
 		for_each_lock(inode, before) {
 			fl = *before;
@@ -844,7 +859,7 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request, str
 		before = &fl->fl_next;
 	}
 
-	/* Process locks with this owner.  */
+	/* Process locks with this owner. */
 	while ((fl = *before) && posix_same_owner(request, fl)) {
 		/* Detect adjacent or overlapping regions (if same lock type)
 		 */
@@ -930,10 +945,9 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request, str
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * The above code only modifies existing locks in case of
-	 * merging or replacing.  If new lock(s) need to be inserted
-	 * all modifications are done bellow this, so it's safe yet to
-	 * bail out.
+	 * The above code only modifies existing locks in case of merging or
+	 * replacing. If new lock(s) need to be inserted all modifications are
+	 * done below this, so it's safe yet to bail out.
 	 */
 	error = -ENOLCK; /* "no luck" */
 	if (right && left == right && !new_fl2)
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index b9d7816..ae377e9 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -926,6 +926,12 @@ int locks_in_grace(struct net *);
 /* that will die - we need it for nfs_lock_info */
 #include <linux/nfs_fs_i.h>
 
+/*
+ * struct file_lock represents a generic "file lock". It's used to represent
+ * POSIX byte range locks, BSD (flock) locks, and leases. It's important to
+ * note that the same struct is used to represent both a request for a lock and
+ * the lock itself, but the same object is never used for both.
+ */
 struct file_lock {
 	struct file_lock *fl_next;	/* singly linked list for this inode  */
 	struct list_head fl_link;	/* doubly linked list of all locks */
-- 
1.7.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-01  3:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-01  3:07 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1 00/11] locks: scalability improvements for file locking Jeff Layton
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1 01/11] cifs: use posix_unblock_lock instead of locks_delete_block Jeff Layton
2013-06-03 21:53   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1 02/11] locks: make generic_add_lease and generic_delete_lease static Jeff Layton
2013-06-03 21:53   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-01  3:07 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2013-06-03 22:00   ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1 03/11] locks: comment cleanups and clarifications J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-04 11:09     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1 04/11] locks: make "added" in __posix_lock_file a bool Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 20:17   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1 05/11] locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 20:17   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1 06/11] locks: convert to i_lock to protect i_flock list Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 21:22   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-05  0:46     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1 07/11] locks: only pull entries off of blocked_list when they are really unblocked Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 21:58   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-05 11:38     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-05 12:24       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-05 12:38         ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-05 12:59           ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1 08/11] locks: convert fl_link to a hlist_node Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 21:59   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-05 11:43     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-05 12:46       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1 09/11] locks: turn the blocked_list into a hashtable Jeff Layton
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1 10/11] locks: add a new "lm_owner_key" lock operation Jeff Layton
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1 11/11] locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 14:19   ` Stefan Metzmacher
2013-06-04 14:39     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 14:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-06-04 14:53       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-04 15:15         ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 14:56       ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-03 19:04 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1 00/11] locks: scalability improvements for file locking Davidlohr Bueso
2013-06-03 21:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-04 10:54   ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 11:56     ` Jim Rees
2013-06-04 12:15       ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1370056054-25449-4-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).