From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Whitehouse Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:52:26 +0000 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] [TRY #2] GFS2: Implement a "bitmap has no extents longer than X" scheme In-Reply-To: <131364899.20160689.1384178482510.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> References: <103368646.17689932.1383753576352.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <1383823945.2712.4.camel@menhir> <131364899.20160689.1384178482510.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1384181546.2700.21.camel@menhir> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 09:01 -0500, Bob Peterson wrote: > Hi Steve, > > I've done a fair amount of testing on your new patch that does not remove > the GBF_FULL flag, and it seems to work fine. Go ahead and use that one > instead of mine. > > IOW: ACK > > Regards, > > Bob Peterson > Red Hat File Systems Ok, that sounds good. I'll add these patches to my tree shortly. Linus has pulled the tree over the weekend, so as soon as -rc1 has arrived, I'll sort out a new tree, Steve.