From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] gfs2: Remove sb_start_write from gfs2_statfs_sync
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:26:49 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409715771.29450602.1606249609812.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <355304031.29450600.1606249586453.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Hi,
Before this patch, function gfs2_statfs_sync called sb_start_write. This is a
violation of the basic vfs rules that state that sb_start_write should always
be taken before s_umount. See this document:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/htmldocs/filesystems/API-sb-start-write.html
"Since freeze protection behaves as a lock, users have to preserve
ordering of freeze protection and other filesystem locks. Generally,
freeze protection should be the outermost lock. In particular, we have:
sb_start_write -> i_mutex (write path, truncate, directory ops, ...) ->
s_umount (freeze_super, thaw_super)"
deactivate_super
down_write(&s->s_umount); <------------------------------------ s_umount
deactivate_locked_super
gfs2_kill_sb
kill_block_super
generic_shutdown_super
gfs2_put_super
gfs2_make_fs_ro
gfs2_statfs_sync(sdp->sd_vfs, 0);
sb_start_write <--------------------- sb_start_write
As far as I can tell, gfs2_statfs_sync doesn't need to call sb_start_write
any more than any other write to the file system, which are policed by glocks.
None of the other functions in gfs2 lock sb_start_write so it only affects
how vfs calls gfs2.
This patch simply removes the call to sb_start_write.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
---
fs/gfs2/super.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/super.c b/fs/gfs2/super.c
index b3d951ab8068..2f56acc41c04 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/super.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/super.c
@@ -353,7 +353,6 @@ int gfs2_statfs_sync(struct super_block *sb, int type)
struct buffer_head *m_bh, *l_bh;
int error;
- sb_start_write(sb);
error = gfs2_glock_nq_init(m_ip->i_gl, LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE, GL_NOCACHE,
&gh);
if (error)
@@ -392,7 +391,6 @@ int gfs2_statfs_sync(struct super_block *sb, int type)
out_unlock:
gfs2_glock_dq_uninit(&gh);
out:
- sb_end_write(sb);
return error;
}
next parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-24 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <355304031.29450600.1606249586453.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
2020-11-24 20:26 ` Bob Peterson [this message]
2020-11-25 17:07 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] gfs2: Remove sb_start_write from gfs2_statfs_sync Andreas Gruenbacher
[not found] <1532030071.31309682.1607003348976.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
2020-12-03 13:49 ` Bob Peterson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1409715771.29450602.1606249609812.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).