From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:51:39 -0700 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 0/7] seq_printf cleanups In-Reply-To: <20141028113240.74dbe5c5@gandalf.local.home> References: <20140929124246.3e39dac8@gandalf.local.home> <20141028113240.74dbe5c5@gandalf.local.home> Message-ID: <1414511499.6643.11.camel@perches.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 11:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > If you haven't already done so, can you update checkpatch.pl to > complain if someone checks the return value of seq_printf(), > seq_puts(), or seq_putc(). I'm not sure that matters much as a rule because I hope soon the compiler will bleat when that happens. There are several more too: seq_vprintf seq_escape seq_write seq_bitmap seq_cpumask/seq_nodemask (and _list variants), seq_put_decimal_xxx