* [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 50/56] fsck.gfs2: Increment link count reporting wrong dinode
@ 2011-08-25 16:59 Bob Peterson
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Bob Peterson @ 2011-08-25 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
From 878f33b79259b6798f19c3569278b46a170eee10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:28:22 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 50/56] fsck.gfs2: Increment link count reporting wrong dinode
The output from fsck.gfs2 was wrong when it reported about a
link count change for lost+found. This patch fixes the message
so it reports the correct dinode block number.
rhbz#675723
---
gfs2/fsck/lost_n_found.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gfs2/fsck/lost_n_found.c b/gfs2/fsck/lost_n_found.c
index 2579480..625de0d 100644
--- a/gfs2/fsck/lost_n_found.c
+++ b/gfs2/fsck/lost_n_found.c
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int add_inode_to_lf(struct gfs2_inode *ip){
/* If it's a directory, lost+found is back-linked to it via .. */
if (is_dir(&ip->i_di, sdp->gfs1))
incr_link_count(lf_dip->i_di.di_num.no_addr,
- ip->i_di.di_mode, _("to lost+found"));
+ ip->i_di.di_num.no_addr, _("to lost+found"));
log_notice( _("Added inode #%llu (0x%llx) to lost+found\n"),
(unsigned long long)ip->i_di.di_num.no_addr,
--
1.7.4.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-08-25 16:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-25 16:59 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 50/56] fsck.gfs2: Increment link count reporting wrong dinode Bob Peterson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).