From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bob Peterson Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:59:25 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 50/56] fsck.gfs2: Increment link count reporting wrong dinode Message-ID: <1682505194.166205.1314291565906.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >From 878f33b79259b6798f19c3569278b46a170eee10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bob Peterson Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:28:22 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 50/56] fsck.gfs2: Increment link count reporting wrong dinode The output from fsck.gfs2 was wrong when it reported about a link count change for lost+found. This patch fixes the message so it reports the correct dinode block number. rhbz#675723 --- gfs2/fsck/lost_n_found.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/gfs2/fsck/lost_n_found.c b/gfs2/fsck/lost_n_found.c index 2579480..625de0d 100644 --- a/gfs2/fsck/lost_n_found.c +++ b/gfs2/fsck/lost_n_found.c @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int add_inode_to_lf(struct gfs2_inode *ip){ /* If it's a directory, lost+found is back-linked to it via .. */ if (is_dir(&ip->i_di, sdp->gfs1)) incr_link_count(lf_dip->i_di.di_num.no_addr, - ip->i_di.di_mode, _("to lost+found")); + ip->i_di.di_num.no_addr, _("to lost+found")); log_notice( _("Added inode #%llu (0x%llx) to lost+found\n"), (unsigned long long)ip->i_di.di_num.no_addr, -- 1.7.4.4