From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bob Peterson Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 08:25:39 -0500 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 0/6] gfs2/buffer folio changes In-Reply-To: <4530554c-c2b3-f93b-6c2c-c411e62d1e45@redhat.com> References: <20230517032442.1135379-1-willy@infradead.org> <4530554c-c2b3-f93b-6c2c-c411e62d1e45@redhat.com> Message-ID: <16d964a4-755f-53c8-b7bf-43584acdd380@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/2/23 7:30 AM, Bob Peterson wrote: > On 5/16/23 10:24 PM, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote: >> This kind of started off as a gfs2 patch series, then became entwined >> with buffer heads once I realised that gfs2 was the only remaining >> caller of __block_write_full_page().? For those not in the gfs2 world, >> the big point of this series is that block_write_full_page() should now >> handle large folios correctly. >> >> It probably makes most sense to take this through Andrew's tree, once >> enough people have signed off on it? > Hi Willy, > > I did some fundamental testing with this patch set in a five-node > cluster, as well as xfstests, and it seemed to work properly. The > testing was somewhat limited, but it passed basic cluster coherency > testing. Sorry it took so long. > > If you want you can add: > Tested-by: Bob Peterson > Reviewed-by: Bob Peterson > > Regards, > > Bob Peterson I was talking with Andreas G and he still has some concerns, so don't push this to a repo quite yet. Regards, Bob Peterson