From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] [PATCH 3/4 Revised] NLM failover - statd changes
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:54:29 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17688.31301.427937.926300@cse.unsw.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <message from Wendy Cheng on Thursday September 14>
On Thursday September 14, wcheng at redhat.com wrote:
> This kernel patch should be paired with nfs-utils user mode changes (in
> patch 4-4 based on nfs-utils-1.0.8-rc4) that is optional. If changes
> made in patch 4-4 is not presented in nfs-utils, the rpc.statd will
> ignore whatever this kernel patch does.
>
> The changes record the ip interface that accepts the lock requests and
> passes the correct "my_name" (in standard IPV4 dot notation) to user
> mode statd (instead of system_utsname.nodename). This enables rpc.statd
> to add the correct taken-over IPv4 address into the 3rd parameter of
> ha_callout program. Current nfs-utils always resets "my_name" into
> loopback address (127.0.0.1), regardless the statement made in rpc.statd
> man page. Check out "man rpc.statd" for details.
>
> Signed-off-by: S. Wendy Cheng <wcheng@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lon Hohberger <lhh@redhat.com>
>
> fs/lockd/host.c | 4 ++--
> fs/lockd/mon.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> fs/lockd/svc4proc.c | 8 +++++++-
> fs/lockd/svcproc.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/lockd/lockd.h | 5 +++--
> include/linux/lockd/sm_inter.h | 1 +
> include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h | 5 +++--
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 5 +++++
> 8 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>
> --- linux-2/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h 2006-09-11 16:52:34.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-3/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h 2006-09-13 14:07:32.000000000 -0400
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static inline void svc_putu32(struct kve
> iov->iov_len += sizeof(u32);
> }
>
> +typedef __u32 svc_addr_t;
>
> /*
> * The context of a single thread, including the request currently being
> @@ -138,8 +139,8 @@ struct svc_rqst {
> unsigned short
> rq_secure : 1; /* secure port */
>
> -
> - __u32 rq_daddr; /* dest addr of request - reply from here */
> + svc_addr_t rq_daddr; /* dest addr of request
> + - reply from here */
>
> void * rq_argp; /* decoded arguments */
> void * rq_resp; /* xdr'd results */
> --- linux-2/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h 2006-09-13 22:48:00.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-3/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h 2006-09-13 22:51:41.000000000 -0400
> @@ -39,12 +39,13 @@
> struct nlm_host {
> struct nlm_host * h_next; /* linked list (hash table) */
> struct sockaddr_in h_addr; /* peer address */
> + svc_addr_t h_server; /* server ip for NLM failover */
Comment should say 'or 0 for client'.
> struct rpc_clnt * h_rpcclnt; /* RPC client to talk to peer */
> char h_name[20]; /* remote hostname */
> u32 h_version; /* interface version */
> unsigned short h_proto; /* transport proto */
> unsigned short h_reclaiming : 1,
> - h_server : 1, /* server side, not client side */
> + h_notused : 1,
Just discard this, no need to rename it to 'h_notused'.
>
> +#if 0
> + if (argp->reclaim) {
> + printk("nlm4svc_proc_lock lock reclaim received\n");
> + }
> +#endif
Can this be removed?
So: mostly looks OK, but will need quite a bit of reworking do to
recent changes in lockd code. So if you can get me a version that
applies to latest -mm, I'll take it from there.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-26 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-14 4:44 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/4 Revised] NLM failover - nlm_unlock Wendy Cheng
[not found] ` <message from Wendy Cheng on Thursday September 14>
2006-09-26 0:39 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Neil Brown
2007-03-23 22:55 ` Wendy Cheng
2006-09-26 0:46 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM failover - nlm_set_igrace Neil Brown
2007-03-26 22:21 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-03-28 2:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-28 5:32 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-03-28 23:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-29 5:31 ` Wendy Cheng
2006-09-26 0:54 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2006-09-26 13:42 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] [PATCH 3/4 Revised] NLM failover - statd changes Wendy Cheng
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-14 4:48 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM failover - nlm_set_igrace Wendy Cheng
2006-09-14 4:50 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 3/4 Revised] NLM failover - statd changes Wendy Cheng
2007-03-27 22:46 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-03-30 7:20 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-03-30 7:25 ` Wendy Cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17688.31301.427937.926300@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).