From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bob Peterson Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:16:35 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 28/32] gfs2: Eliminate GFS2_RDF_UPTODATE flag in favor of buffer existence In-Reply-To: <62e12358-40c7-85cb-ec0a-c8b103843ed0@redhat.com> References: <20191113213030.237431-1-rpeterso@redhat.com> <20191113213030.237431-29-rpeterso@redhat.com> <62e12358-40c7-85cb-ec0a-c8b103843ed0@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1924651997.29551613.1573737395476.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----- Original Message ----- > These are two different things... the buffer_head flags signal whether > the buffer head is up to date with respect to what is on disk. The > GFS2_RDF_UPTODATE flag is there to indicate whether the internal copy of > the various fields in the resource group is up to date. > > These might match depending on how the rgrp's internal copy of the > fields is maintained, but not sure that this is guaranteed. Has this > been tested with the rgrplvb option? We should make sure that is all > still working correctly, > > Steve. You're right, and it seems obvious now. I obviously wasn't thinking clearly when I did this. I'll eliminate this patch. Bob