cluster-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] Move struct gfs2_rgrp_lvb out of gfs2_ondisk.h
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 08:19:17 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1946139195.2641427.1579094357901.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62faa428-a933-4848-d897-deb038078ac3@redhat.com>

----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
> 
> On 15/01/2020 09:24, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 9:58 AM Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >> On 15/01/2020 08:49, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> >>> There's no point in sharing the internal structure of lock value blocks
> >>> with user space.
> >> The reason that is in ondisk is that changing that structure is
> >> something that needs to follow the same rules as changing the on disk
> >> structures. So it is there as a reminder of that,
> > I can see a point in that. The reason I've posted this is because Bob
> > was complaining that changes to include/uapi/linux/gfs2_ondisk.h break
> > his out-of-tree module build process. (One of the patches I'm working
> > on adds an inode LVB.) The same would be true of on-disk format
> > changes as well of course, and those definitely need to be shared with
> > user space. I'm not usually building gfs2 out of tree, so I'm
> > indifferent to this change.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andreas
> >
> Why would we need to be able to build gfs2 (at least I assume it is
> gfs2) out of tree anyway?
> 
> Steve.

Simply for productivity. The difference is this procedure, which literally takes 10 seconds,
if done simultaneously on all nodes using something like cssh:

make -C /usr/src/kernels/4.18.0-165.el8.x86_64 modules M=$PWD
rmmod gfs2
insmod gfs2.ko

Compared to a procedure like this, which takes at least 30 minutes:

make (a new kernel .src.rpm)
scp or rsync the .src.rpm to a build machine
cd ~/rpmbuild/
rpm --force -i --nodeps /home/bob/*kernel-4.18.0*.src.rpm &> /dev/null
echo $?
rpmbuild --target=x86_64 -ba SPECS/kernel.spec
( -or- submit a "real" kernel build)
then wait for the kernel build
Pull down all necessary kernel rpms
scp <those rpms> to all the nodes in the cluster
rpm --force -i --nodeps <those rpms>
/sbin/reboot all the nodes in the cluster
wait for all the nodes to reboot, the cluster to stabilize, etc.

Regards,

Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems



  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-15 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-15  8:49 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] Move struct gfs2_rgrp_lvb out of gfs2_ondisk.h Andreas Gruenbacher
2020-01-15  8:58 ` Steven Whitehouse
2020-01-15  9:24   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2020-01-15  9:49     ` Steven Whitehouse
2020-01-15 13:19       ` Bob Peterson [this message]
2020-01-15 15:26         ` Andrew Price
2020-01-15 15:43   ` Andrew Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1946139195.2641427.1579094357901.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).