From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] Move struct gfs2_rgrp_lvb out of gfs2_ondisk.h
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 08:19:17 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1946139195.2641427.1579094357901.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62faa428-a933-4848-d897-deb038078ac3@redhat.com>
----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
>
> On 15/01/2020 09:24, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 9:58 AM Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >> On 15/01/2020 08:49, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> >>> There's no point in sharing the internal structure of lock value blocks
> >>> with user space.
> >> The reason that is in ondisk is that changing that structure is
> >> something that needs to follow the same rules as changing the on disk
> >> structures. So it is there as a reminder of that,
> > I can see a point in that. The reason I've posted this is because Bob
> > was complaining that changes to include/uapi/linux/gfs2_ondisk.h break
> > his out-of-tree module build process. (One of the patches I'm working
> > on adds an inode LVB.) The same would be true of on-disk format
> > changes as well of course, and those definitely need to be shared with
> > user space. I'm not usually building gfs2 out of tree, so I'm
> > indifferent to this change.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andreas
> >
> Why would we need to be able to build gfs2 (at least I assume it is
> gfs2) out of tree anyway?
>
> Steve.
Simply for productivity. The difference is this procedure, which literally takes 10 seconds,
if done simultaneously on all nodes using something like cssh:
make -C /usr/src/kernels/4.18.0-165.el8.x86_64 modules M=$PWD
rmmod gfs2
insmod gfs2.ko
Compared to a procedure like this, which takes at least 30 minutes:
make (a new kernel .src.rpm)
scp or rsync the .src.rpm to a build machine
cd ~/rpmbuild/
rpm --force -i --nodeps /home/bob/*kernel-4.18.0*.src.rpm &> /dev/null
echo $?
rpmbuild --target=x86_64 -ba SPECS/kernel.spec
( -or- submit a "real" kernel build)
then wait for the kernel build
Pull down all necessary kernel rpms
scp <those rpms> to all the nodes in the cluster
rpm --force -i --nodeps <those rpms>
/sbin/reboot all the nodes in the cluster
wait for all the nodes to reboot, the cluster to stabilize, etc.
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-15 8:49 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] Move struct gfs2_rgrp_lvb out of gfs2_ondisk.h Andreas Gruenbacher
2020-01-15 8:58 ` Steven Whitehouse
2020-01-15 9:24 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2020-01-15 9:49 ` Steven Whitehouse
2020-01-15 13:19 ` Bob Peterson [this message]
2020-01-15 15:26 ` Andrew Price
2020-01-15 15:43 ` Andrew Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1946139195.2641427.1579094357901.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).