* [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] [TRY #2] GFS2: Drop inadequate rgrps from the reservation tree
[not found] <113290048.17688056.1383753391651.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
@ 2013-11-06 15:58 ` Bob Peterson
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Bob Peterson @ 2013-11-06 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Hi,
This is just basically a resend of a patch I posted earlier.
It didn't change from its original, except in diff offsets, etc:
This patch fixes a bug in the GFS2 block allocation code. The problem
starts if a process already has a multi-block reservation, but for
some reason, another process disqualifies it from further allocations.
For example, the other process might set on the GFS2_RDF_ERROR bit.
The process holding the reservation jumps to label skip_rgrp, but
that label comes after the code that removes the reservation from the
tree. Therefore, the no longer usable reservation is not removed from
the rgrp's reservations tree; it's lost. Eventually, the lost reservation
causes the count of reserved blocks to get off, and eventually that
causes a BUG_ON(rs->rs_rbm.rgd->rd_reserved < rs->rs_free) to trigger.
This patch moves the call to after label skip_rgrp so that the
disqualified reservation is properly removed from the tree, thus keeping
the rgrp rd_reserved count sane.
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
index 0fb2299..ba5eb41 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
@@ -1944,15 +1944,16 @@ int gfs2_inplace_reserve(struct gfs2_inode *ip, const struct gfs2_alloc_parms *a
return 0;
}
- /* Drop reservation, if we couldn't use reserved rgrp */
- if (gfs2_rs_active(rs))
- gfs2_rs_deltree(rs);
check_rgrp:
/* Check for unlinked inodes which can be reclaimed */
if (rs->rs_rbm.rgd->rd_flags & GFS2_RDF_CHECK)
try_rgrp_unlink(rs->rs_rbm.rgd, &last_unlinked,
ip->i_no_addr);
skip_rgrp:
+ /* Drop reservation, if we couldn't use reserved rgrp */
+ if (gfs2_rs_active(rs))
+ gfs2_rs_deltree(rs);
+
/* Unlock rgrp if required */
if (!rg_locked)
gfs2_glock_dq_uninit(&rs->rs_rgd_gh);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-11-06 15:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <113290048.17688056.1383753391651.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2013-11-06 15:58 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] [TRY #2] GFS2: Drop inadequate rgrps from the reservation tree Bob Peterson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).