cluster-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wcheng@sourceware.org <wcheng@sourceware.org>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs ops_inode.c
Date: 15 Oct 2006 07:25:14 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061015072514.21254.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)

CVSROOT:	/cvs/cluster
Module name:	cluster
Changes by:	wcheng at sourceware.org	2006-10-15 07:25:14

Modified files:
	gfs-kernel/src/gfs: ops_inode.c 

Log message:
	Just found 2.6.18 kernel has something called down_read_non_onwer for
	rwsemaphore. If we can implement a similar function that does something
	like "up_write_if_owner", then we can put i_alloc_sem back to correct
	state. Correct the comment and mark this possibility.

Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ops_inode.c.diff?cvsroot=cluster&r1=1.13&r2=1.14

--- cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ops_inode.c	2006/10/15 06:32:06	1.13
+++ cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ops_inode.c	2006/10/15 07:25:09	1.14
@@ -1349,14 +1349,13 @@
 	 * To avoid this to happen, i_alloc_sem must be dropped and trust
 	 * be put into glock that it can carry the same protection. 
 	 *
-	 * One issue with dropping i_alloc_sem is gfs_setattr() can be 
-	 * called from other code path without this sempaphore. Since linux
-	 * semaphore implementation doesn't include owner id, we have no way 
-	 * to reliably decide whether the following "up" is a correct reset. 
-	 * This implies if i_alloc_sem is ever used by non-direct_IO code 
-	 * path in the future, this hack will fall apart. In short, with this 
-	 * change, i_alloc_sem has become a meaningless lock within GFS and 
-	 * don't expect its counter representing any correct state. 
+	 * One issue with dropping i_alloc_sem is that the gfs_setattr() 
+	 * can be invoked from other code path without this sempaphore. 
+	 * We'll need a new rwsem function that can "up" the semaphore 
+	 * only when it is needed. Before that happens (will research the 
+	 * possibility), i_alloc_sem (now) is a meaningless lock within 
+	 * GFS. If it is ever been used by other non-directIO code, this
+	 * hack will fall apart.
 	 *
 	 * wcheng at redhat.com 10/14/06  
 	 */ 



             reply	other threads:[~2006-10-15  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-15  7:25 wcheng [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-11 22:15 [Cluster-devel] cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs ops_inode.c rpeterso
2007-07-11 21:58 rpeterso
2007-06-29 21:57 rpeterso
2007-06-05 18:21 wcheng
2007-06-05 17:46 wcheng
2007-01-18 20:40 wcheng
2006-10-23 20:47 bmarzins
2006-10-03 17:27 rohara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061015072514.21254.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=wcheng@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).