From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 08:45:10 -0500
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [GFS2] Don't use journal lock type
In-Reply-To: <1186478767.8765.708.camel@quoit>
References: <1186478767.8765.708.camel@quoit>
Message-ID: <20070807134510.GA19779@redhat.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:26:06AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
>  		error = gfs2_glock_nq_num(sdp, sdp->sd_lockstruct.ls_jid,
> -					  &gfs2_journal_glops,
> +					  &gfs2_inode_glops,
>  					  LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE, LM_FLAG_NOEXP,
>  					  &sdp->sd_journal_gh);

The lock for journal N is now the same as the lock for the inode at
block N -- that doesn't work.