From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:21:52 -0500
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] NLM failover unlock commands
In-Reply-To: <478F7F84.4040909@redhat.com>
References: <20080110075959.GA9623@infradead.org> <4788665B.4020405@redhat.com>
	<18315.62909.330258.83038@notabene.brown>
	<478D14C5.1000804@redhat.com>
	<18317.7319.443532.62244@notabene.brown>
	<478D3820.9080402@redhat.com> <20080117151007.GB16581@fieldses.org>
	<478F78E8.40601@redhat.com> <20080117161415.GE16581@fieldses.org>
	<478F7F84.4040909@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20080117162152.GF16581@fieldses.org>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:17:08AM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote:
> J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>> Yeah, sounds good.  Maybe under Documentation/filesystems?  And it might
>> also be helpful to leave a reference to it in the code, e.g., in
>> nfsctl.c:
>>
>> 	/*
>> 	 * The following are used for failover; see
>> 	 * Documentation/filesystems/nfsd-failover.txt for details.
>> 	 */
>>
>> --b.
>>   
>
> ok, looks good ... but let's "fix" this on the resume patch ? or you  
> want it on the unlock patch *now* ?

It's not urgent.

--b.