cluster-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Cluster-devel] disallowed in cluster3
@ 2009-08-05 16:52 David Teigland
  2009-08-06  7:08 ` Christine Caulfield
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Teigland @ 2009-08-05 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cluster-devel.redhat.com

When rewriting daemons for cluster3 to remove groupd, I wrote them to not need
or use the disallowed-nodes feature from cman for handling remerging of
cluster partitions.  In compat mode, however, (the cluster2 code) they would
still depend on that cman feature, which is why it still exists in cluster3
cman.

I've found, though, that when we do have a partition remerge, cman's
disallowed feature gets in the way of the daemons trying to handle it
themselves (which I'm testing, it doesn't seem quite right in all
partitioning/merging cases yet.)

So, I think what we need is for cluster3 cman to turn off the disallowed
feature unless the cluster is in compat mode, i.e. <group groupd_compat="1"/>
exists.

Dave



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Cluster-devel] disallowed in cluster3
  2009-08-05 16:52 [Cluster-devel] disallowed in cluster3 David Teigland
@ 2009-08-06  7:08 ` Christine Caulfield
  2009-08-06 14:04   ` David Teigland
                     ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christine Caulfield @ 2009-08-06  7:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cluster-devel.redhat.com

On 05/08/09 17:52, David Teigland wrote:
> When rewriting daemons for cluster3 to remove groupd, I wrote them to not need
> or use the disallowed-nodes feature from cman for handling remerging of
> cluster partitions.  In compat mode, however, (the cluster2 code) they would
> still depend on that cman feature, which is why it still exists in cluster3
> cman.
>
> I've found, though, that when we do have a partition remerge, cman's
> disallowed feature gets in the way of the daemons trying to handle it
> themselves (which I'm testing, it doesn't seem quite right in all
> partitioning/merging cases yet.)
>
> So, I think what we need is for cluster3 cman to turn off the disallowed
> feature unless the cluster is in compat mode, i.e.<group groupd_compat="1"/>
> exists.


Thanks, I've been looking for an excuse to add code to cluster3 to 
disable that mode ;-)

I'm not happy with cman reading groupd tags out of cluster.conf though. 
The alternatives are to have an extra tag for cman, but that risks users 
only setting one or the other and causing havoc. So how about a higher 
level <cluster compat="x"> flag ?

Chrissie



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Cluster-devel] disallowed in cluster3
  2009-08-06  7:08 ` Christine Caulfield
@ 2009-08-06 14:04   ` David Teigland
  2009-08-06 17:39   ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
  2009-08-12 21:48   ` David Teigland
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Teigland @ 2009-08-06 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cluster-devel.redhat.com

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 08:08:37AM +0100, Christine Caulfield wrote:
> On 05/08/09 17:52, David Teigland wrote:
> >When rewriting daemons for cluster3 to remove groupd, I wrote them to not 
> >need
> >or use the disallowed-nodes feature from cman for handling remerging of
> >cluster partitions.  In compat mode, however, (the cluster2 code) they 
> >would
> >still depend on that cman feature, which is why it still exists in cluster3
> >cman.
> >
> >I've found, though, that when we do have a partition remerge, cman's
> >disallowed feature gets in the way of the daemons trying to handle it
> >themselves (which I'm testing, it doesn't seem quite right in all
> >partitioning/merging cases yet.)
> >
> >So, I think what we need is for cluster3 cman to turn off the disallowed
> >feature unless the cluster is in compat mode, i.e.<group 
> >groupd_compat="1"/>
> >exists.
> 
> 
> Thanks, I've been looking for an excuse to add code to cluster3 to 
> disable that mode ;-)
> 
> I'm not happy with cman reading groupd tags out of cluster.conf though. 
> The alternatives are to have an extra tag for cman, but that risks users 
> only setting one or the other and causing havoc. So how about a higher 
> level <cluster compat="x"> flag ?

Yeah, the group/groupd_compat is a little odd in that way... I have all my
daemons checking for that one tag.  cluster compat wouldn't be bad, or instead
of a cluster attribute it could be a more generic element -- that would just
mean changing <group groupd_compat="x"/> into <compat version="x"/> or
something like that.

With the release out, I think it's too late to remove group/groupd_compat, but
we can add something new that supersedes it.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Cluster-devel] disallowed in cluster3
  2009-08-06  7:08 ` Christine Caulfield
  2009-08-06 14:04   ` David Teigland
@ 2009-08-06 17:39   ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
  2009-08-12 21:48   ` David Teigland
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Fabio M. Di Nitto @ 2009-08-06 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cluster-devel.redhat.com

On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 08:08 +0100, Christine Caulfield wrote:
> On 05/08/09 17:52, David Teigland wrote:
> > When rewriting daemons for cluster3 to remove groupd, I wrote them to not need
> > or use the disallowed-nodes feature from cman for handling remerging of
> > cluster partitions.  In compat mode, however, (the cluster2 code) they would
> > still depend on that cman feature, which is why it still exists in cluster3
> > cman.
> >
> > I've found, though, that when we do have a partition remerge, cman's
> > disallowed feature gets in the way of the daemons trying to handle it
> > themselves (which I'm testing, it doesn't seem quite right in all
> > partitioning/merging cases yet.)
> >
> > So, I think what we need is for cluster3 cman to turn off the disallowed
> > feature unless the cluster is in compat mode, i.e.<group groupd_compat="1"/>
> > exists.
> 
> 
> Thanks, I've been looking for an excuse to add code to cluster3 to 
> disable that mode ;-)
> 
> I'm not happy with cman reading groupd tags out of cluster.conf though. 

We can always use cman-preconfig to map back and forward <cluster
compat.. to/from <groupd_compat.. 

after all we do all the config "dirty laundry" there... :)

Fabio



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Cluster-devel] disallowed in cluster3
  2009-08-06  7:08 ` Christine Caulfield
  2009-08-06 14:04   ` David Teigland
  2009-08-06 17:39   ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
@ 2009-08-12 21:48   ` David Teigland
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Teigland @ 2009-08-12 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cluster-devel.redhat.com

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 08:08:37AM +0100, Christine Caulfield wrote:
> On 05/08/09 17:52, David Teigland wrote:
> >When rewriting daemons for cluster3 to remove groupd, I wrote them to not 
> >need
> >or use the disallowed-nodes feature from cman for handling remerging of
> >cluster partitions.  In compat mode, however, (the cluster2 code) they 
> >would
> >still depend on that cman feature, which is why it still exists in cluster3
> >cman.
> >
> >I've found, though, that when we do have a partition remerge, cman's
> >disallowed feature gets in the way of the daemons trying to handle it
> >themselves (which I'm testing, it doesn't seem quite right in all
> >partitioning/merging cases yet.)
> >
> >So, I think what we need is for cluster3 cman to turn off the disallowed
> >feature unless the cluster is in compat mode, i.e.<group 
> >groupd_compat="1"/>
> >exists.
> 
> 
> Thanks, I've been looking for an excuse to add code to cluster3 to 
> disable that mode ;-)

Trying this out and testing the daemon's handling of partition merging
situations...  I uncovered one of my own comments in fenced:

/* We don't require cman dirty/disallowed to detect and handle cpg merges
after a partition, because we already do that with started_count checks and
our own disallowed flag.  But, we do need cman dirty/disallowed to deal with
correctly skipping victims that rejoin the cluster.  Without cman
dirty/disallowed, we'd skip fencing a node after a merge of a partition since
the merged node would be a cman member and a fenced:daemon cpg member.  By
setting the dirty flag, cman won't report a dirty merged node as a member, so
we'll continue fencing it. */

So, the primary reason for cman disallowed is gone, but I'd forgotten about
this little unsolved detail around bypassing fencing of a node that has
rebooted and rejoined (distinguishing that from partitioned and rejoined).
There really should be a way for fenced to deal with that without punting it
off to cman disallowed, I'll be working on that.

Dave



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-12 21:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-05 16:52 [Cluster-devel] disallowed in cluster3 David Teigland
2009-08-06  7:08 ` Christine Caulfield
2009-08-06 14:04   ` David Teigland
2009-08-06 17:39   ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
2009-08-12 21:48   ` David Teigland

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).