From: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] fixing cpg names in 3.0.8?
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:16:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100112171615.GB24645@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B4C9C94.2050106@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 04:00:20PM +0000, Christine Caulfield wrote:
> On 12/01/10 16:24, David Teigland wrote:
> >I just discovered that the cpg group names that fenced, dlm_controld and
> >gfs_controld use in cluster3 include a nul within the name length. This
> >can happen because cpg names have both a string part and a length part,
> >and the length is currently being set to strlen + 1 instead of strlen.
> >It's harmless since all the code is making the same mistake, but it's an
> >obvious flaw.
> >
> >You can easily see this by the trailing \x00 from corosync-cpgtool,
> >
> >fenced:default\x00
> >
> >If we fixed the length of the names, it would break internode
> >compatibility between 3.0.7 and 3.0.8 releases, e.g.
> >
> >"fenced:default\x00" and "fenced:default" are two different groups.
> >
> >AFAIK we're not yet guaranteeing rolling upgrade compatibility from one
> >3.0 release to the next, so I think I should go ahead and fix this, unless
> >anyone feels strongly otherwise?
>
>
> I'm sure we've seen this before. Oh well I'll repeat my opinion anyway.
>
> I don't think it's a flaw and I don't see that it needs to be "fixed".
> It's just the way things happen. What benefits accrue from changing it ?
Good point, it isn't a flaw per se, we just have inconsistent usages of
that api (ocfs_controld, at least, sets length to strlen). There's
something to be said for consistency, but you've convinced me it's not
worth changing.
How about making corosync-cpgtool default to the -e behavior, and making
-e = escape unprintable characters in group name ?
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-12 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-12 16:24 [Cluster-devel] fixing cpg names in 3.0.8? David Teigland
2010-01-12 16:00 ` Christine Caulfield
2010-01-12 17:16 ` David Teigland [this message]
2010-01-12 16:55 ` Jan Friesse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100112171615.GB24645@redhat.com \
--to=teigland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).