From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dejan Muhamedagic Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:15:04 +0200 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [Linux-ha-dev] new resource agents repository commit policy In-Reply-To: <4D90AC3C.40805@redhat.com> References: <20110314170753.GB3650@squib> <20110318092048.GE23764@suse.de> <20110328152813.GA6989@rondo.homenet> <4D90AC3C.40805@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20110329131504.GA3825@squib> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 05:41:48PM +0200, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: > On 3/28/2011 5:28 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:20:48AM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > >> On 2011-03-14T19:49:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> > >>> I suspect you want b) with maybe 6 people for redundancy. > >>> The pull request workflow should be well suited to a project like this > >>> and impose minimal overhead. > >> > >> I prefer b as well, since it adds another review step. (Should we use > >> the github.com code review tools?) > > > > OK. It seems like nobody's that much interesting in this, so we > > can just as well go with option b). > > WFM of course. Woman FIDE Master? :) > > Fabio, I'd like to get the commit access rights. Florian Haas and > > Lars Ellenberg have also been frequently reviewing user > > contributions, so they should get commit rights too. I understand > > that Florian already has that. Lars is about to create a > > github.com account and he'll send you later his account name. > > You will need to talk to Andrew for this. I am not the owner of the repo. I guess that Andrew's listening. > For now I did merge bits from Florian and I can do it while Andrew will > allow accounts to commit. > > > > >> Oh, and we can use the ha-wg-technical mailing list for cross-project > >> coordination ;-) > > > > Yes, but the list is very new and some people who may be affected > > are perhaps not all subscribed. > > Let?s make sure that the message is sent again to the mailing lists, we > can clearly still collect patches on the old lists for two/three months > while we transition. I actually expected the ha-wg-technical list to be low volume and for "project coordination" and similar, not for daily business. Cheers, Dejan > Fabio >