[Cluster-devel] [PATCH 26/34] dlm: Drop __TIME__ usage

[Cluster-devel] [PATCH 26/34] dlm: Drop __TIME__ usage

[David Teigland]

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:47:16PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 5.4.2011 16:59, Michal Marek napsal(a):
> > The kernel already prints its build timestamp during boot, no need to
> > repeat it in random drivers and produce different object files each
> > time.
> > 
> > Cc: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>
> > Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
> > Cc: cluster-devel at redhat.com
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
> > ---
> >  fs/dlm/main.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I don't see this patch in today's linux-next. Any objection against me
> applying it to the kbuild-2.6.git repository?

No, please do.
Thanks,
Dave

[Cluster-devel] [PATCH 27/34] gfs2: Drop __TIME__ usage

[Steven Whitehouse]

Hi,

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 22:48 +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 5.4.2011 16:59, Michal Marek napsal(a):
> > The kernel already prints its build timestamp during boot, no need to
> > repeat it in random drivers and produce different object files each
> > time.
> > 
> > Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
> > Cc: cluster-devel at redhat.com
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
> > ---
> >  fs/gfs2/main.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I don't see this patch in today's linux-next. Any objection against me
> applying it to the kbuild-2.6.git repository?
> 
> Thanks,
> Michal
> 
No, I think that should be ok. It was added as a method to spot when
someone had compiled their own module against a distro kernel, but tbh
this isn't a problem in practice, so I don't think it will be a problem,

Steve.