cluster-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] fallocate vs O_(D)SYNC
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:45:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111116124550.GA11650@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111116105413.GA2916@quack.suse.cz>

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:54:13AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Yeah, only that nobody calls that fsync() automatically if the fd is
> O_SYNC if I'm right. But maybe calling fdatasync() on the range which was
> fallocated from sys_fallocate() if the fd is O_SYNC would do the trick for
> most filesystems? That would match how we treat O_SYNC for other operations
> as well. I'm just not sure whether XFS wouldn't take unnecessarily big hit
> with this.

This would work fine with XFS and be equivalent to what it does for
O_DSYNC now.  But I'd rather see every filesystem do the right thing
and make sure the update actually is on disk when doing O_(D)SYNC
operations.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-16 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-16  8:42 [Cluster-devel] fallocate vs O_(D)SYNC Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16  9:43 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-11-16 10:54   ` Jan Kara
2011-11-16 11:20     ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-11-16 12:45     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-11-16 13:39       ` Jan Kara
2011-11-16 13:42         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16 15:57           ` Jan Kara
2011-11-16 16:16             ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]             ` <20111116161806.GP29279@shiny>
     [not found]               ` <20111116193540.GL23779@wotan.suse.de>
     [not found]                 ` <20111116200310.GN23779@wotan.suse.de>
2011-11-17 10:16                   ` Joel Becker
2011-11-18 12:09             ` Steven Whitehouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111116124550.GA11650@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).