cluster-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] fence daemon problems
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:24:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121003162411.GC12614@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24E144B8C0207547AD09C467A8259F75576A155B@lisa.maurer-it.com>

On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 04:12:10PM +0000, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > Yes, it's a stateful partition merge, and I think /var/log/messages should have
> > mentioned something about that.  When a node is partitioned from the
> > others (e.g. network disconnected), it has to be cleanly reset before it's
> > allowed back.  "cleanly reset" typically means rebooted.  If it comes back
> > without being reset (e.g. network reconnected), then the others ignore it,
> > which is what you saw.

> What message should I look for?

I was wrong, I was thinking about the "daemon node %d stateful merge"
messages which are debug, but should probably be changed to error.

> I don't really understand why 'dlm_controld' initiates fencing, although
> the node does not has quorum?
> 
> I thought 'dlm_controld' should wait until cluster is quorate before
> starting fence actions?

I guess you're talking about the dlm_tool ls output?  The "fencing" there
means it is waiting for fenced to finish fencing before it starts dlm
recovery.  fenced waits for quorum.

hp2:~# dlm_tool ls
dlm lockspaces
name          rgmanager
id            0x5231f3eb
flags         0x00000004 kern_stop
change        member 3 joined 1 remove 0 failed 0 seq 2,2
members       2 3 4
new change    member 2 joined 0 remove 1 failed 1 seq 3,3
new status    wait_messages 0 wait_condition 1 fencing
new members   3 4





  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-03 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-03  8:03 [Cluster-devel] fence daemon problems Dietmar Maurer
2012-10-03  9:25 ` Dietmar Maurer
2012-10-03 14:46   ` David Teigland
2012-10-03 16:08     ` Dietmar Maurer
2012-10-03 16:12     ` Dietmar Maurer
2012-10-03 16:24       ` David Teigland [this message]
2012-10-03 16:26         ` Dietmar Maurer
2012-10-03 16:44           ` David Teigland
2012-10-03 16:55             ` Dietmar Maurer
2012-10-03 17:10               ` David Teigland
2012-10-09 17:14               ` Lon Hohberger
2012-10-09 17:13             ` Lon Hohberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121003162411.GC12614@redhat.com \
    --to=teigland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).