From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] mm: Avoid returning VM_FAULT_RETRY from ->page_mkwrite handlers
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:13:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170203151356.GB2267@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170203150729.15863-1-jack@suse.cz>
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:07:29PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> Some ->page_mkwrite handlers may return VM_FAULT_RETRY as its return
> code (GFS2 or Lustre can definitely do this). However VM_FAULT_RETRY
> from ->page_mkwrite is completely unhandled by the mm code and results
> in locking and writeably mapping the page which definitely is not what
> the caller wanted. Fix Lustre and block_page_mkwrite_ret() used by other
> filesystems (notably GFS2) to return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE instead which
> results in bailing out from the fault code, the CPU then retries the
> access, and we fault again effectively doing what the handler wanted.
Reading this commit message makes me wonder if this is the best fix.
It would seem logical that if I want the fault to be retried that I should
return VM_FAULT_RETRY, not VM_FAULT_NOPAGE. Why don't we have the MM
treat VM_FAULT_RETRY the same way that it treats VM_FAULT_NOPAGE and give
driver / filesystem writers one fewer way to shoot themselves in the foot?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-03 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-03 15:07 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] mm: Avoid returning VM_FAULT_RETRY from ->page_mkwrite handlers Jan Kara
2017-02-03 15:13 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2017-02-03 15:46 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-03 15:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-02-03 16:10 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-03 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2017-02-06 9:24 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-03 23:44 ` [Cluster-devel] [lustre-devel] " Xiong, Jinshan
2017-02-06 8:59 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-06 20:52 ` Xiong, Jinshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170203151356.GB2267@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).