cluster-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 13/17] dlm: fix _can_be_granted() for lock at the head of covert queue.
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:41:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170809164144.GD21204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a232ce9d3e5f459882995f46d47f3a34@TGXML394.toshiba.local>

On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 05:51:37AM +0000, tsutomu.owa at toshiba.co.jp wrote:
> If there is a lock resource conflict on multiple nodes, the lock on
> convert queue may not be granted forever.
> 
> EX.)
> grant queue:
>     node0 grmode NL / rqmode IV
>     node1 grmode NL / rqmode IV
> 
> convert queue:
>     node2 grmode NL / rqmode EX
>     node3 grmode PR / rqmode EX
> 
> wait queue:
>     node4 grmode IV / rqmode PR
>     node5 grmode IV / rqmode PR
> 
> When the lock conversion (node PR -> NL) of node 0 is completed, the lock
> of node 2 should be grantable. However, __can_be_granted() returns 0
> because the grmode of the lock on node 3 in convert queue is PR.
> 
> When checking the lock at the head of convert queue, exclude
> queue_conflict() targeting convert queue.

This example doesn't look right.  node2's NL->EX cannot be granted because
it conflicts with the PR lock held by node3.  (The grmode is still valid
when a lock is on the convert queue.)

There are two valid outcomes in the example above, either 1) node3 PR->EX
is granted, or 2) node4 and node5 PR requests are granted.  What have you
seen the dlm do in this state?  If it does not grant anything, that would
be a bug.

Based on the sequence of events you describe, I think that the correct
outcome would be 1 (granting node3's PR->EX), based on this rule:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/fs/dlm/lock.c#n2429


> -	if (queue_conflict(&r->res_convertqueue, lkb))
> +	if (!first_in_list(lkb, &r->res_convertqueue) &&
> +	    queue_conflict(&r->res_convertqueue, lkb))
>  		return 0;



  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-09 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-09  5:51 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 13/17] dlm: fix _can_be_granted() for lock at the head of covert queue tsutomu.owa
2017-08-09 16:41 ` David Teigland [this message]
2017-08-09 18:48   ` David Teigland
2017-08-17 23:40     ` tsutomu.owa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170809164144.GD21204@redhat.com \
    --to=teigland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).