cluster-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Improve throughput through rgrp sharing (v2)
@ 2018-05-08 20:04 Bob Peterson
  2018-05-08 20:04 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/2] GFS2: Introduce GLF_EX_SHARING bit: local EX sharing Bob Peterson
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bob Peterson @ 2018-05-08 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cluster-devel.redhat.com

Hi,

On 18 April, I posted v1 of this patch set. The idea is to allow multiple
processes on a node to share a glock that's held exclusively in order to
improve performance. Sharing rgrps allows for better throughput by
reducing contention.

Version 1 implemented this by introducing a new glock mode for sharing
glocks. Steve Whitehouse suggested we didn't need a new mode: we can
accomplish the same thing just by having a new glock flag, which also
makes the patch more simple.

This version 2 patch set implements Steve's suggestion.

The first patch introduces the new glock flag. The second patch puts
it into use for rgrp sharing. Exclusive access to the rgrp is implemented
through an rwsem.

Performance testing using iozone looks even better than version 1.
---
Bob Peterson (2):
  GFS2: Introduce GLF_EX_SHARING bit: local EX sharing
  GFS2: Take advantage of new EXSH glock mode for rgrps

 fs/gfs2/bmap.c   |   2 +-
 fs/gfs2/dir.c    |   2 +-
 fs/gfs2/glock.c  |  23 ++++++++++---
 fs/gfs2/glock.h  |   4 +++
 fs/gfs2/incore.h |   2 ++
 fs/gfs2/inode.c  |   7 ++--
 fs/gfs2/rgrp.c   | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 fs/gfs2/rgrp.h   |   2 +-
 fs/gfs2/super.c  |   8 +++--
 fs/gfs2/xattr.c  |   8 +++--
 10 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

-- 
2.14.3



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/2] GFS2: Introduce GLF_EX_SHARING bit: local EX sharing
@ 2018-05-14 21:20 Andreas Gruenbacher
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Gruenbacher @ 2018-05-14 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cluster-devel.redhat.com

On 8 May 2018 at 22:04, Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> wrote:
> This patch is a first step in rgrp sharing. It allows for glocks
> locked in EX mode to be shared amongst processes on that node.
> Like a Shared glock, multiple processes may hold the lock in
> EX mode at the same time, provided they're all on the same
> node. All other nodes will see this as an EX lock.
> For now, there are no users of the new flag. A future patch
> will use it to improve performance with rgrp sharing.

The flag isn't called GLF_EX_SHARING anymore, so please fix the
subject. I don't like the flag name LM_FLAG_SHAREDEX very much. The
flag indicates that the node holds a glock exclusively and individual
processes on the node can share it, so how about LM_FLAG_NODEEX or
similar instead?

> Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/gfs2/glock.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
>  fs/gfs2/glock.h |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> index 097bd3c0f270..a463de5fad2e 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> @@ -279,10 +279,20 @@ void gfs2_glock_put(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
>
>  static inline int may_grant(const struct gfs2_glock *gl, const struct gfs2_holder *gh)
>  {
> -       const struct gfs2_holder *gh_head = list_entry(gl->gl_holders.next, const struct gfs2_holder, gh_list);
> -       if ((gh->gh_state == LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE ||
> -            gh_head->gh_state == LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE) && gh != gh_head)
> -               return 0;
> +       const struct gfs2_holder *gh_head = list_entry(gl->gl_holders.next,
> +                                                      const struct gfs2_holder,
> +                                                      gh_list);
> +
> +       if (gh != gh_head) {
> +               if (gh_head->gh_state == LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE &&
> +                   (gh_head->gh_flags & LM_FLAG_SHAREDEX) &&
> +                   gh->gh_state == LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE &&
> +                   (gh->gh_flags & LM_FLAG_SHAREDEX))
> +                       return 1;
> +               if ((gh->gh_state == LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE ||
> +                    gh_head->gh_state == LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE))
> +                       return 0;
> +       }
>         if (gl->gl_state == gh->gh_state)
>                 return 1;
>         if (gh->gh_flags & GL_EXACT)
> @@ -292,6 +302,9 @@ static inline int may_grant(const struct gfs2_glock *gl, const struct gfs2_holde
>                         return 1;
>                 if (gh->gh_state == LM_ST_DEFERRED && gh_head->gh_state == LM_ST_DEFERRED)
>                         return 1;
> +               if (gh_head->gh_flags & LM_FLAG_SHAREDEX &&
> +                   gh->gh_flags & LM_FLAG_SHAREDEX)
> +                       return 1;
>         }
>         if (gl->gl_state != LM_ST_UNLOCKED && (gh->gh_flags & LM_FLAG_ANY))
>                 return 1;
> @@ -1680,6 +1693,8 @@ static const char *hflags2str(char *buf, u16 flags, unsigned long iflags)
>                 *p++ = 'A';
>         if (flags & LM_FLAG_PRIORITY)
>                 *p++ = 'p';
> +       if (flags & LM_FLAG_SHAREDEX)
> +               *p++ = 's';
>         if (flags & GL_ASYNC)
>                 *p++ = 'a';
>         if (flags & GL_EXACT)
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.h b/fs/gfs2/glock.h
> index 5e12220cc0c2..3ab7d7f8d986 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/glock.h
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ enum {
>   * request and directly join the other shared lock.  A shared lock request
>   * without the priority flag might be forced to wait until the deferred
>   * requested had acquired and released the lock.
> + *
> + * LM_FLAG_SHAREDEX
> + * The glock may be held in EXCLUSIVE mode, but it's still shared

That doesn't work to document what the flag does, sorry.

>   */
>
>  #define LM_FLAG_TRY            0x0001
> @@ -85,6 +88,7 @@ enum {
>  #define LM_FLAG_NOEXP          0x0004
>  #define LM_FLAG_ANY            0x0008
>  #define LM_FLAG_PRIORITY       0x0010
> +#define LM_FLAG_SHAREDEX       0x0020
>  #define GL_ASYNC               0x0040
>  #define GL_EXACT               0x0080
>  #define GL_SKIP                        0x0100
> --
> 2.14.3
>

Thanks,
Andreas



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-14 21:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-05-08 20:04 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Improve throughput through rgrp sharing (v2) Bob Peterson
2018-05-08 20:04 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/2] GFS2: Introduce GLF_EX_SHARING bit: local EX sharing Bob Peterson
2018-05-08 20:04 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/2] GFS2: Take advantage of new EXSH glock mode for rgrps Bob Peterson
2018-05-09  8:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Improve throughput through rgrp sharing (v2) Steven Whitehouse
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-14 21:20 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/2] GFS2: Introduce GLF_EX_SHARING bit: local EX sharing Andreas Gruenbacher

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).