From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 3/3] gfs2: Fix missed wakeups in find_insert_glock
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 08:02:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190308150216.8732-4-rpeterso@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190308150216.8732-1-rpeterso@redhat.com>
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Mark Syms has reported seeing tasks that are stuck waiting in
find_insert_glock. It turns out that struct lm_lockname contains four padding
bytes on 64-bit architectures that function glock_waitqueue doesn't skip when
hashing the glock name. As a result, we can end up waking up the wrong
waitqueue, and the waiting tasks may be stuck forever.
Fix that by using ht_parms.key_len instead of sizeof(struct lm_lockname) for
the key length.
Reported-by: Mark Syms <mark.syms@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
---
fs/gfs2/glock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
index f66773c71bcd..d32964cd1117 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int glock_wake_function(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned int mode,
static wait_queue_head_t *glock_waitqueue(struct lm_lockname *name)
{
- u32 hash = jhash2((u32 *)name, sizeof(*name) / 4, 0);
+ u32 hash = jhash2((u32 *)name, ht_parms.key_len / 4, 0);
return glock_wait_table + hash_32(hash, GLOCK_WAIT_TABLE_BITS);
}
--
2.20.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-08 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-08 15:02 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 0/3] GFS2: Pre-pull patch posting (merge window) Bob Peterson
2019-03-08 15:02 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/3] gfs: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Bob Peterson
2019-03-08 15:02 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/3] gfs2: Fix an incorrect gfs2_assert() Bob Peterson
2019-03-08 15:02 ` Bob Peterson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190308150216.8732-4-rpeterso@redhat.com \
--to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).