From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:43:02 -0700 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/5] vfs: create a generic checking function for FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR In-Reply-To: <20190626153542.GE5171@magnolia> References: <156151632209.2283456.3592379873620132456.stgit@magnolia> <156151633829.2283456.834142172527987802.stgit@magnolia> <20190626041133.GB32272@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20190626153542.GE5171@magnolia> Message-ID: <20190626154302.GA31445@infradead.org> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 08:35:42AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > static inline void simple_fill_fsxattr(struct fsxattr *fa, unsigned xflags) > > { > > memset(fa, 0, sizeof(*fa)); > > fa->fsx_xflags = xflags; > > } > > > > and let the compiler optimize the crap out? > > The v2 series used to do that, but Christoph complained that having a > helper for a two-line memset and initialization was silly[1] so now we > have this version. > > I don't mind reinstating it as a static inline helper, but I'd like some > input from any of the btrfs developers (or you, Al) about which form is > preferred. I complained having that helper in btrfs. I think Al wants a generic one, which at least makes a little more sense. That being said I wonder if we should lift these attr ioctls to file op methods and deal with all that crap in VFS code instead of having all those duplicated ioctl parsers.