From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 3/3] gfs2: Eliminate go_xmote_bh in favor of go_lock
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:02:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210824140241.149386-4-rpeterso@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210824140241.149386-1-rpeterso@redhat.com>
Before this patch, the freeze glock was the only glock to use the
go_xmote_bh glock op (glop). The go_xmote_bh glop is done when
a glock is locked. But so is go_lock. This patch eliminates the
glop altogether in favor of just using go_lock for the freeze
glock. This is for better consistency, readability, etc.
Using go_lock was previously not possible because of the bug
fixed by the previous patch.
I also fixed a misleading comment in do_promote.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
---
fs/gfs2/glock.c | 12 +-----------
fs/gfs2/glops.c | 6 +++---
fs/gfs2/incore.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
index d43eed1696ab..1d421998535e 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static void do_error(struct gfs2_glock *gl, const int ret)
* do_promote - promote as many requests as possible on the current queue
* @gl: The glock
*
- * Returns: 1 if there is a blocked holder at the head of the list, or 2
+ * Returns: 1 if there is a blocked waiter at the head of the list, or 2
* if a type specific operation is underway.
*/
@@ -504,7 +504,6 @@ static void gfs2_demote_wake(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
static void finish_xmote(struct gfs2_glock *gl, unsigned int ret)
{
- const struct gfs2_glock_operations *glops = gl->gl_ops;
struct gfs2_holder *gh;
unsigned state = ret & LM_OUT_ST_MASK;
int rv;
@@ -562,15 +561,6 @@ static void finish_xmote(struct gfs2_glock *gl, unsigned int ret)
if (test_and_clear_bit(GLF_DEMOTE_IN_PROGRESS, &gl->gl_flags))
gfs2_demote_wake(gl);
if (state != LM_ST_UNLOCKED) {
- if (gh && glops->go_xmote_bh) {
- spin_unlock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock);
- rv = glops->go_xmote_bh(gh);
- spin_lock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock);
- if (rv) {
- do_error(gl, rv);
- goto out;
- }
- }
rv = do_promote(gl);
if (rv == 2)
goto out_locked;
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glops.c b/fs/gfs2/glops.c
index 8ae2f33e014e..5067e89c32e6 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/glops.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/glops.c
@@ -597,10 +597,10 @@ static int freeze_go_sync(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
}
/**
- * freeze_go_xmote_bh - After promoting/demoting the freeze glock
+ * freeze_go_lock - After promoting/demoting the freeze glock
* @gh: the holder of the glock
*/
-static int freeze_go_xmote_bh(struct gfs2_holder *gh)
+static int freeze_go_lock(struct gfs2_holder *gh)
{
struct gfs2_glock *gl = gh->gh_gl;
struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = gl->gl_name.ln_sbd;
@@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ const struct gfs2_glock_operations gfs2_rgrp_glops = {
const struct gfs2_glock_operations gfs2_freeze_glops = {
.go_sync = freeze_go_sync,
- .go_xmote_bh = freeze_go_xmote_bh,
+ .go_lock = freeze_go_lock,
.go_demote_ok = freeze_go_demote_ok,
.go_type = LM_TYPE_NONDISK,
.go_flags = GLOF_NONDISK,
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/incore.h b/fs/gfs2/incore.h
index 354d6230d0f7..04ac1537fee7 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/incore.h
+++ b/fs/gfs2/incore.h
@@ -217,7 +217,6 @@ struct lm_lockname {
struct gfs2_glock_operations {
int (*go_sync) (struct gfs2_glock *gl);
- int (*go_xmote_bh)(struct gfs2_holder *gh);
void (*go_inval) (struct gfs2_glock *gl, int flags);
int (*go_demote_ok) (const struct gfs2_glock *gl);
int (*go_lock) (struct gfs2_holder *gh);
--
2.31.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-24 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-24 14:02 [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 0/3] gfs2: Fix freeze/thaw journal check problems Bob Peterson
2021-08-24 14:02 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 1/3] gfs2: switch go_xmote_bh glop to pass gh not gl Bob Peterson
2021-08-24 16:12 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-08-24 16:48 ` Bob Peterson
2021-08-24 22:27 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-08-25 16:11 ` Bob Peterson
2021-08-24 14:02 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 2/3] gfs2: Fix broken freeze_go_xmote_bh Bob Peterson
2021-08-24 16:10 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-08-24 14:02 ` Bob Peterson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210824140241.149386-4-rpeterso@redhat.com \
--to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).