From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 159/219] gfs2: Don't call dlm after protocol is unmounted
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 07:45:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210909114635.143983-159-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210909114635.143983-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit d1340f80f0b8066321b499a376780da00560e857 ]
In the gfs2 withdraw sequence, the dlm protocol is unmounted with a call
to lm_unmount. After a withdraw, users are allowed to unmount the
withdrawn file system. But at that point we may still have glocks left
over that we need to free via unmount's call to gfs2_gl_hash_clear.
These glocks may have never been completed because of whatever problem
caused the withdraw (IO errors or whatever).
Before this patch, function gdlm_put_lock would still try to call into
dlm to unlock these leftover glocks, which resulted in dlm returning
-EINVAL because the lock space was abandoned. These glocks were never
freed because there was no mechanism after that to free them.
This patch adds a check to gdlm_put_lock to see if the locking protocol
was inactive (DFL_UNMOUNT flag) and if so, free the glock and not
make the invalid call into dlm.
I could have combined this "if" with the one that follows, related to
leftover glock LVBs, but I felt the code was more readable with its own
if clause.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c b/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c
index dac040162ecc..50578f881e6d 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c
@@ -299,6 +299,11 @@ static void gdlm_put_lock(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
gfs2_sbstats_inc(gl, GFS2_LKS_DCOUNT);
gfs2_update_request_times(gl);
+ /* don't want to call dlm if we've unmounted the lock protocol */
+ if (test_bit(DFL_UNMOUNT, &ls->ls_recover_flags)) {
+ gfs2_glock_free(gl);
+ return;
+ }
/* don't want to skip dlm_unlock writing the lvb when lock has one */
if (test_bit(SDF_SKIP_DLM_UNLOCK, &sdp->sd_flags) &&
--
2.30.2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-09 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210909114635.143983-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2021-09-09 11:44 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 097/219] gfs2: Fix glock recursion in freeze_go_xmote_bh Sasha Levin
2021-09-09 11:45 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210909114635.143983-159-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).