From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Aring Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH dlm/next 1/2] fs: dlm: use dlm_recovery_stopped instead of test_bit Message-ID: <20211005173410.4004891-1-aahringo@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This patch will change to use dlm_recovery_stopped() which is the dlm way to check if the LSFL_RECOVER_STOP flag in ls_flags by using the helper. It is an atomic operation but the check is still as before to fetch the value if ls_recover_lock is held. There might be more further investigations if the value can be changed afterwards and if it has any side effects. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring --- fs/dlm/rcom.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/dlm/rcom.c b/fs/dlm/rcom.c index 6cba86470278..5821b777a1a7 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/rcom.c +++ b/fs/dlm/rcom.c @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ void dlm_receive_rcom(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_rcom *rc, int nodeid) spin_lock(&ls->ls_recover_lock); status = ls->ls_recover_status; - stop = test_bit(LSFL_RECOVER_STOP, &ls->ls_flags); + stop = dlm_recovery_stopped(ls); seq = ls->ls_recover_seq; spin_unlock(&ls->ls_recover_lock); -- 2.27.0