cluster-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 05/19] fs: dlm: cleanup plock_op vs plock_xop
Date: Mon,  4 Apr 2022 16:06:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220404200646.3170301-6-aahringo@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220404200646.3170301-1-aahringo@redhat.com>

Lately the different casting between plock_op and plock_xop and list
holders which was involved showed some issues which were hard to see.
This patch removes the "plock_xop" structure and introduces a
"struct plock_async_data". This structure will be set in "struct plock_op"
in case of asynchronous lock handling as the original "plock_xop" was
made for. There is no need anymore to cast pointers around for
additional fields in case of asynchronous lock handling.  As disadvantage
another allocation was introduces but only needed in the asynchronous
case which is currently only used in combination with nfs lockd.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
---
 fs/dlm/plock.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c
index 55fba2f0234f..4e60dd657cb6 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/plock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c
@@ -19,20 +19,20 @@ static struct list_head recv_list;
 static wait_queue_head_t send_wq;
 static wait_queue_head_t recv_wq;
 
-struct plock_op {
-	struct list_head list;
-	int done;
-	struct dlm_plock_info info;
-	int (*callback)(struct file_lock *fl, int result);
-};
-
-struct plock_xop {
-	struct plock_op xop;
+struct plock_async_data {
 	void *fl;
 	void *file;
 	struct file_lock flc;
+	int (*callback)(struct file_lock *fl, int result);
 };
 
+struct plock_op {
+	struct list_head list;
+	int done;
+	struct dlm_plock_info info;
+	/* if set indicates async handling */
+	struct plock_async_data *data;
+};
 
 static inline void set_version(struct dlm_plock_info *info)
 {
@@ -58,6 +58,12 @@ static int check_version(struct dlm_plock_info *info)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void dlm_release_plock_op(struct plock_op *op)
+{
+	kfree(op->data);
+	kfree(op);
+}
+
 static void send_op(struct plock_op *op)
 {
 	set_version(&op->info);
@@ -101,22 +107,21 @@ static void do_unlock_close(struct dlm_ls *ls, u64 number,
 int dlm_posix_lock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
 		   int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
 {
+	struct plock_async_data *op_data;
 	struct dlm_ls *ls;
 	struct plock_op *op;
-	struct plock_xop *xop;
 	int rv;
 
 	ls = dlm_find_lockspace_local(lockspace);
 	if (!ls)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	xop = kzalloc(sizeof(*xop), GFP_NOFS);
-	if (!xop) {
+	op = kzalloc(sizeof(*op), GFP_NOFS);
+	if (!op) {
 		rv = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	op = &xop->xop;
 	op->info.optype		= DLM_PLOCK_OP_LOCK;
 	op->info.pid		= fl->fl_pid;
 	op->info.ex		= (fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK);
@@ -125,22 +130,32 @@ int dlm_posix_lock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
 	op->info.number		= number;
 	op->info.start		= fl->fl_start;
 	op->info.end		= fl->fl_end;
+	/* async handling */
 	if (fl->fl_lmops && fl->fl_lmops->lm_grant) {
+		op_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*op_data), GFP_NOFS);
+		if (!op_data) {
+			dlm_release_plock_op(op);
+			rv = -ENOMEM;
+			goto out;
+		}
+
 		/* fl_owner is lockd which doesn't distinguish
 		   processes on the nfs client */
 		op->info.owner	= (__u64) fl->fl_pid;
-		op->callback	= fl->fl_lmops->lm_grant;
-		locks_init_lock(&xop->flc);
-		locks_copy_lock(&xop->flc, fl);
-		xop->fl		= fl;
-		xop->file	= file;
+		op_data->callback = fl->fl_lmops->lm_grant;
+		locks_init_lock(&op_data->flc);
+		locks_copy_lock(&op_data->flc, fl);
+		op_data->fl		= fl;
+		op_data->file	= file;
+
+		op->data = op_data;
 	} else {
 		op->info.owner	= (__u64)(long) fl->fl_owner;
 	}
 
 	send_op(op);
 
-	if (!op->callback) {
+	if (!op->data) {
 		rv = wait_event_interruptible(recv_wq, (op->done != 0));
 		if (rv == -ERESTARTSYS) {
 			log_debug(ls, "dlm_posix_lock: wait killed %llx",
@@ -148,7 +163,7 @@ int dlm_posix_lock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
 			spin_lock(&ops_lock);
 			list_del(&op->list);
 			spin_unlock(&ops_lock);
-			kfree(xop);
+			dlm_release_plock_op(op);
 			do_unlock_close(ls, number, file, fl);
 			goto out;
 		}
@@ -167,7 +182,7 @@ int dlm_posix_lock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
 				  (unsigned long long)number);
 	}
 
-	kfree(xop);
+	dlm_release_plock_op(op);
 out:
 	dlm_put_lockspace(ls);
 	return rv;
@@ -177,20 +192,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dlm_posix_lock);
 /* Returns failure iff a successful lock operation should be canceled */
 static int dlm_plock_callback(struct plock_op *op)
 {
+	struct plock_async_data *op_data = op->data;
 	struct file *file;
 	struct file_lock *fl;
 	struct file_lock *flc;
 	int (*notify)(struct file_lock *fl, int result) = NULL;
-	struct plock_xop *xop = (struct plock_xop *)op;
 	int rv = 0;
 
 	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&op->list));
 
 	/* check if the following 2 are still valid or make a copy */
-	file = xop->file;
-	flc = &xop->flc;
-	fl = xop->fl;
-	notify = op->callback;
+	file = op_data->file;
+	flc = &op_data->flc;
+	fl = op_data->fl;
+	notify = op_data->callback;
 
 	if (op->info.rv) {
 		notify(fl, op->info.rv);
@@ -221,7 +236,7 @@ static int dlm_plock_callback(struct plock_op *op)
 	}
 
 out:
-	kfree(xop);
+	dlm_release_plock_op(op);
 	return rv;
 }
 
@@ -285,7 +300,7 @@ int dlm_posix_unlock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
 		rv = 0;
 
 out_free:
-	kfree(op);
+	dlm_release_plock_op(op);
 out:
 	dlm_put_lockspace(ls);
 	fl->fl_flags = fl_flags;
@@ -345,7 +360,7 @@ int dlm_posix_get(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
 		rv = 0;
 	}
 
-	kfree(op);
+	dlm_release_plock_op(op);
 out:
 	dlm_put_lockspace(ls);
 	return rv;
@@ -381,7 +396,7 @@ static ssize_t dev_read(struct file *file, char __user *u, size_t count,
 	   (the process did not make an unlock call). */
 
 	if (op->info.flags & DLM_PLOCK_FL_CLOSE)
-		kfree(op);
+		dlm_release_plock_op(op);
 
 	if (copy_to_user(u, &info, sizeof(info)))
 		return -EFAULT;
@@ -413,7 +428,7 @@ static ssize_t dev_write(struct file *file, const char __user *u, size_t count,
 		    op->info.owner == info.owner) {
 			list_del_init(&op->list);
 			memcpy(&op->info, &info, sizeof(info));
-			if (op->callback)
+			if (op->data)
 				do_callback = 1;
 			else
 				op->done = 1;
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-04 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-04 20:06 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 00/19] fs: dlm: resend patches for v5.18-rc1 Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 01/19] fs: dlm: uninitialized variable on error in dlm_listen_for_all() Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 02/19] fs: dlm: fix missing check in validate_lock_args Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 03/19] fs: dlm: fix plock invalid read Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 04/19] fs: dlm: replace sanity checks with WARN_ON Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 06/19] fs: dlm: rearrange async condition return Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 07/19] fs: dlm: improve plock logging if interrupted Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 08/19] fs: dlm: remove unnecessary INIT_LIST_HEAD() Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 09/19] fs: dlm: move global to static inits Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 10/19] fs: dlm: add __CHECKER__ for false positives Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 11/19] fs: dlm: use __le types for options header Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 12/19] fs: dlm: use __le types for dlm header Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 13/19] fs: dlm: use __le types for rcom messages Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 14/19] fs: dlm: use __le types for dlm messages Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 15/19] fs: dlm: move conversion to compile time Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 16/19] fs: dlm: remove __user conversion warnings Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 17/19] fs: dlm: remove found label in dlm_master_lookup Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 18/19] fs: dlm: cleanup lock handling " Alexander Aring
2022-04-04 20:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5.18-rc1 19/19] fs: dlm: check required context while close Alexander Aring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220404200646.3170301-6-aahringo@redhat.com \
    --to=aahringo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).