From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 5/7] fs: dlm: handle recovery -EAGAIN case as retry
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 13:06:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220610170616.3480642-6-aahringo@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220610170616.3480642-1-aahringo@redhat.com>
This patch adds additional functionality if recovery returns -EAGAIN
error code to not deliver this failure to the potential caller of
dlm_new_lockspace(). If -EAGAIN is returned we try to run recovery again
and hope with a additional schedule() it doesn't return -EAGAIN anymore.
If a maximum amount is hit, we fence ourself by running panic().
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
---
fs/dlm/recoverd.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/recoverd.c b/fs/dlm/recoverd.c
index 90e8b7f440da..eeb221c175a2 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/recoverd.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/recoverd.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include "requestqueue.h"
#include "recoverd.h"
+#define DLM_RECOVERY_MAX_RETRIES 5
/* If the start for which we're re-enabling locking (seq) has been superseded
by a newer stop (ls_recover_seq), we need to leave locking disabled.
@@ -259,7 +260,7 @@ static int ls_recover(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_recover *rv)
static void do_ls_recovery(struct dlm_ls *ls)
{
struct dlm_recover *rv = NULL;
- int error;
+ int error, count = 0;
spin_lock(&ls->ls_recover_lock);
rv = ls->ls_recover_args;
@@ -269,30 +270,53 @@ static void do_ls_recovery(struct dlm_ls *ls)
spin_unlock(&ls->ls_recover_lock);
if (rv) {
- error = ls_recover(ls, rv);
- switch (error) {
- case 0:
- ls->ls_recovery_result = 0;
- complete(&ls->ls_recovery_done);
-
- dlm_lsop_recover_done(ls);
- break;
- case -EINTR:
- /* if recovery was interrupted -EINTR we wait for the next
- * ls_recover() iteration until it hopefully succeeds.
+ do {
+ /* we try DLM_MAX_RECOVERY_RETRIES times again to run
+ * recovery, if any -EAGAIN is not resolved this
+ * time we will let DLM_ASSERT() fence ourself.
*/
- log_rinfo(ls, "%s %llu interrupted and should be queued to run again",
- __func__, (unsigned long long)rv->seq);
- break;
- default:
- log_rinfo(ls, "%s %llu error %d", __func__,
- (unsigned long long)rv->seq, error);
+ DLM_ASSERT(count < DLM_RECOVERY_MAX_RETRIES,
+ pr_err("%s %llu too many recovery retries %d\n",
+ __func__, (unsigned long long)rv->seq););
- /* let new_lockspace() get aware of critical error */
- ls->ls_recovery_result = error;
- complete(&ls->ls_recovery_done);
- break;
- }
+ error = ls_recover(ls, rv);
+ switch (error) {
+ case 0:
+ ls->ls_recovery_result = 0;
+ complete(&ls->ls_recovery_done);
+
+ dlm_lsop_recover_done(ls);
+ break;
+ case -EINTR:
+ /* if recovery was interrupted -EINTR we wait for the next
+ * ls_recover() iteration until it hopefully succeeds.
+ */
+ log_rinfo(ls,
+ "%s %llu interrupted and should be queued to run again",
+ __func__, (unsigned long long)rv->seq);
+ break;
+ case -EAGAIN:
+ /* either API is returning -EAGAIN or some critical errors
+ * returning -EAGAIN which let the recovery run again. There
+ * is a schedule() between it in the hope that the error resolves
+ * itself. If not the above DLM_ASSERT() will hit.
+ */
+ log_rinfo(ls, "%s %llu recovery wants to run again",
+ __func__, (unsigned long long)rv->seq);
+ schedule();
+ break;
+ default:
+ log_rinfo(ls, "%s %llu error %d", __func__,
+ (unsigned long long)rv->seq, error);
+
+ /* let new_lockspace() get aware of critical error */
+ ls->ls_recovery_result = error;
+ complete(&ls->ls_recovery_done);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ count++;
+ } while (error == -EAGAIN);
kfree(rv->nodes);
kfree(rv);
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-10 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-10 17:06 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 0/7] fs: dlm: recovery error handling Alexander Aring
2022-06-10 17:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 1/7] fs: dlm: add notes for recovery and membership handling Alexander Aring
2022-06-10 17:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 2/7] fs: dlm: call dlm_lsop_recover_prep once Alexander Aring
2022-06-10 17:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 3/7] fs: dlm: let new_lockspace() wait until recovery Alexander Aring
2022-06-10 17:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 4/7] fs: dlm: handle recovery result outside of ls_recover Alexander Aring
2022-06-10 17:06 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
2022-06-10 17:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 6/7] fs: dlm: change -EINVAL recovery error to -EAGAIN Alexander Aring
2022-06-14 14:54 ` Alexander Aring
2022-06-10 17:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 7/7] fs: dlm: add WARN_ON for non waiter case Alexander Aring
2022-06-14 17:59 ` Alexander Aring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220610170616.3480642-6-aahringo@redhat.com \
--to=aahringo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).