cluster-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 5/7] fs: dlm: handle recovery -EAGAIN case as retry
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 13:06:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220610170616.3480642-6-aahringo@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220610170616.3480642-1-aahringo@redhat.com>

This patch adds additional functionality if recovery returns -EAGAIN
error code to not deliver this failure to the potential caller of
dlm_new_lockspace(). If -EAGAIN is returned we try to run recovery again
and hope with a additional schedule() it doesn't return -EAGAIN anymore.
If a maximum amount is hit, we fence ourself by running panic().

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
---
 fs/dlm/recoverd.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/recoverd.c b/fs/dlm/recoverd.c
index 90e8b7f440da..eeb221c175a2 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/recoverd.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/recoverd.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include "requestqueue.h"
 #include "recoverd.h"
 
+#define DLM_RECOVERY_MAX_RETRIES 5
 
 /* If the start for which we're re-enabling locking (seq) has been superseded
    by a newer stop (ls_recover_seq), we need to leave locking disabled.
@@ -259,7 +260,7 @@ static int ls_recover(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_recover *rv)
 static void do_ls_recovery(struct dlm_ls *ls)
 {
 	struct dlm_recover *rv = NULL;
-	int error;
+	int error, count = 0;
 
 	spin_lock(&ls->ls_recover_lock);
 	rv = ls->ls_recover_args;
@@ -269,30 +270,53 @@ static void do_ls_recovery(struct dlm_ls *ls)
 	spin_unlock(&ls->ls_recover_lock);
 
 	if (rv) {
-		error = ls_recover(ls, rv);
-		switch (error) {
-		case 0:
-			ls->ls_recovery_result = 0;
-			complete(&ls->ls_recovery_done);
-
-			dlm_lsop_recover_done(ls);
-			break;
-		case -EINTR:
-			/* if recovery was interrupted -EINTR we wait for the next
-			 * ls_recover() iteration until it hopefully succeeds.
+		do {
+			/* we try DLM_MAX_RECOVERY_RETRIES times again to run
+			 * recovery, if any -EAGAIN is not resolved this
+			 * time we will let DLM_ASSERT() fence ourself.
 			 */
-			log_rinfo(ls, "%s %llu interrupted and should be queued to run again",
-				  __func__, (unsigned long long)rv->seq);
-			break;
-		default:
-			log_rinfo(ls, "%s %llu error %d", __func__,
-				  (unsigned long long)rv->seq, error);
+			DLM_ASSERT(count < DLM_RECOVERY_MAX_RETRIES,
+				   pr_err("%s %llu too many recovery retries %d\n",
+					  __func__, (unsigned long long)rv->seq););
 
-			/* let new_lockspace() get aware of critical error */
-			ls->ls_recovery_result = error;
-			complete(&ls->ls_recovery_done);
-			break;
-		}
+			error = ls_recover(ls, rv);
+			switch (error) {
+			case 0:
+				ls->ls_recovery_result = 0;
+				complete(&ls->ls_recovery_done);
+
+				dlm_lsop_recover_done(ls);
+				break;
+			case -EINTR:
+				/* if recovery was interrupted -EINTR we wait for the next
+				 * ls_recover() iteration until it hopefully succeeds.
+				 */
+				log_rinfo(ls,
+					  "%s %llu interrupted and should be queued to run again",
+					  __func__, (unsigned long long)rv->seq);
+				break;
+			case -EAGAIN:
+				/* either API is returning -EAGAIN or some critical errors
+				 * returning -EAGAIN which let the recovery run again. There
+				 * is a schedule() between it in the hope that the error resolves
+				 * itself. If not the above DLM_ASSERT() will hit.
+				 */
+				log_rinfo(ls, "%s %llu recovery wants to run again",
+					  __func__, (unsigned long long)rv->seq);
+				schedule();
+				break;
+			default:
+				log_rinfo(ls, "%s %llu error %d", __func__,
+					  (unsigned long long)rv->seq, error);
+
+				/* let new_lockspace() get aware of critical error */
+				ls->ls_recovery_result = error;
+				complete(&ls->ls_recovery_done);
+				break;
+			}
+
+			count++;
+		} while (error == -EAGAIN);
 
 		kfree(rv->nodes);
 		kfree(rv);
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-10 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-10 17:06 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 0/7] fs: dlm: recovery error handling Alexander Aring
2022-06-10 17:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 1/7] fs: dlm: add notes for recovery and membership handling Alexander Aring
2022-06-10 17:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 2/7] fs: dlm: call dlm_lsop_recover_prep once Alexander Aring
2022-06-10 17:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 3/7] fs: dlm: let new_lockspace() wait until recovery Alexander Aring
2022-06-10 17:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 4/7] fs: dlm: handle recovery result outside of ls_recover Alexander Aring
2022-06-10 17:06 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
2022-06-10 17:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 6/7] fs: dlm: change -EINVAL recovery error to -EAGAIN Alexander Aring
2022-06-14 14:54   ` Alexander Aring
2022-06-10 17:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v5.19-rc1 7/7] fs: dlm: add WARN_ON for non waiter case Alexander Aring
2022-06-14 17:59   ` Alexander Aring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220610170616.3480642-6-aahringo@redhat.com \
    --to=aahringo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).