* [Cluster-devel] [PATCH dlm/next 2/3] fs: dlm: fix context imbalance warning in __put_lkb()
2022-06-24 1:28 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH dlm/next 1/3] fs: dlm: move assert into release function Alexander Aring
@ 2022-06-24 1:28 ` Alexander Aring
2022-06-24 1:29 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH dlm/next 3/3] fs: dlm: fix context imbalance warning in put_rsb() Alexander Aring
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Aring @ 2022-06-24 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
This patch fixes the following sparse warning:
warning: context imbalance in '__put_lkb' - unexpected unlock
it does this by unlock the ls_lkbidr_spin lock inside of the release
functionality of kref_put_lock() and do a __releases() annotation at the
release function. The kref_put_lock() for __put_lkb() has a special
requirement to pass an additional dlm_ls pointer to the release callback,
this is done by providing an own implementation of kref_put_lock() that
is named dlm_kref_put_lock() and can pass an additional parameter.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
---
fs/dlm/lock.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index dac7eb75dba9..4b5cff76d376 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -1256,7 +1256,8 @@ static int find_lkb(struct dlm_ls *ls, uint32_t lkid, struct dlm_lkb **lkb_ret)
return lkb ? 0 : -ENOENT;
}
-static void kill_lkb(struct kref *kref)
+static void kill_lkb(struct kref *kref, struct dlm_ls *ls)
+ __releases(&ls->ls_lkbidr_spin)
{
struct dlm_lkb *lkb = container_of(kref, struct dlm_lkb, lkb_ref);
@@ -1264,6 +1265,29 @@ static void kill_lkb(struct kref *kref)
can release the write_lock before the detach_lkb */
DLM_ASSERT(!lkb->lkb_status, dlm_print_lkb(lkb););
+
+ idr_remove(&ls->ls_lkbidr, lkb->lkb_id);
+ spin_unlock(&ls->ls_lkbidr_spin);
+
+ detach_lkb(lkb);
+
+ /* for local/process lkbs, lvbptr points to caller's lksb */
+ if (lkb->lkb_lvbptr && is_master_copy(lkb))
+ dlm_free_lvb(lkb->lkb_lvbptr);
+ dlm_free_lkb(lkb);
+}
+
+static inline int dlm_kref_put_lock(struct kref *kref,
+ void (*release)(struct kref *kref,
+ struct dlm_ls *ls),
+ spinlock_t *lock,
+ struct dlm_ls *ls)
+{
+ if (refcount_dec_and_lock(&kref->refcount, lock)) {
+ release(kref, ls);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return 0;
}
/* __put_lkb() is used when an lkb may not have an rsb attached to
@@ -1271,24 +1295,8 @@ static void kill_lkb(struct kref *kref)
static int __put_lkb(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
{
- uint32_t lkid = lkb->lkb_id;
- int rv;
-
- rv = kref_put_lock(&lkb->lkb_ref, kill_lkb,
- &ls->ls_lkbidr_spin);
- if (rv) {
- idr_remove(&ls->ls_lkbidr, lkid);
- spin_unlock(&ls->ls_lkbidr_spin);
-
- detach_lkb(lkb);
-
- /* for local/process lkbs, lvbptr points to caller's lksb */
- if (lkb->lkb_lvbptr && is_master_copy(lkb))
- dlm_free_lvb(lkb->lkb_lvbptr);
- dlm_free_lkb(lkb);
- }
-
- return rv;
+ return dlm_kref_put_lock(&lkb->lkb_ref, kill_lkb,
+ &ls->ls_lkbidr_spin, ls);
}
int dlm_put_lkb(struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [Cluster-devel] [PATCH dlm/next 3/3] fs: dlm: fix context imbalance warning in put_rsb()
2022-06-24 1:28 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH dlm/next 1/3] fs: dlm: move assert into release function Alexander Aring
2022-06-24 1:28 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH dlm/next 2/3] fs: dlm: fix context imbalance warning in __put_lkb() Alexander Aring
@ 2022-06-24 1:29 ` Alexander Aring
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Aring @ 2022-06-24 1:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
This patch fixes the following sparse warning:
warning: context imbalance in 'put_rsb' - unexpected unlock
it does this by unlock the ls_rsbtbl[bucket].lock lock inside of the
release functionality of kref_put_lock() and do a __releases() annotation
at the release function.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
---
fs/dlm/lock.c | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index 4b5cff76d376..70ee15c44bd2 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -352,12 +352,9 @@ static void put_rsb(struct dlm_rsb *r)
{
struct dlm_ls *ls = r->res_ls;
uint32_t bucket = r->res_bucket;
- int rv;
- rv = kref_put_lock(&r->res_ref, toss_rsb,
- &ls->ls_rsbtbl[bucket].lock);
- if (rv)
- spin_unlock(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[bucket].lock);
+ kref_put_lock(&r->res_ref, toss_rsb,
+ &ls->ls_rsbtbl[bucket].lock);
}
void dlm_put_rsb(struct dlm_rsb *r)
@@ -1140,20 +1137,24 @@ void dlm_dump_rsb_name(struct dlm_ls *ls, char *name, int len)
}
static void toss_rsb(struct kref *kref)
+ __releases(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[bucket].lock)
{
struct dlm_rsb *r = container_of(kref, struct dlm_rsb, res_ref);
+ uint32_t bucket = r->res_bucket;
struct dlm_ls *ls = r->res_ls;
DLM_ASSERT(list_empty(&r->res_root_list), dlm_print_rsb(r););
kref_init(&r->res_ref);
- rb_erase(&r->res_hashnode, &ls->ls_rsbtbl[r->res_bucket].keep);
- rsb_insert(r, &ls->ls_rsbtbl[r->res_bucket].toss);
+ rb_erase(&r->res_hashnode, &ls->ls_rsbtbl[bucket].keep);
+ rsb_insert(r, &ls->ls_rsbtbl[bucket].toss);
r->res_toss_time = jiffies;
- ls->ls_rsbtbl[r->res_bucket].flags |= DLM_RTF_SHRINK;
+ ls->ls_rsbtbl[bucket].flags |= DLM_RTF_SHRINK;
if (r->res_lvbptr) {
dlm_free_lvb(r->res_lvbptr);
r->res_lvbptr = NULL;
}
+
+ spin_unlock(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[bucket].lock);
}
/* See comment for unhold_lkb */
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread