From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 15/16] fs: dlm: const void resource name parameter
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 15:43:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220815194328.2208580-16-aahringo@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220815194328.2208580-1-aahringo@redhat.com>
The resource name parameter should never be changed by DLM so we declare
it as const. At some point it is handled as a char pointer, a resource
name can be a non printable ascii string as well. This patch change it
to handle it as void pointer as it is offered by DLM API.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
---
fs/dlm/lock.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
fs/dlm/lock.h | 2 +-
include/linux/dlm.h | 2 +-
include/trace/events/dlm.h | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index cef25f8ac82e..c830feb26384 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static int pre_rsb_struct(struct dlm_ls *ls)
unlock any spinlocks, go back and call pre_rsb_struct again.
Otherwise, take an rsb off the list and return it. */
-static int get_rsb_struct(struct dlm_ls *ls, char *name, int len,
+static int get_rsb_struct(struct dlm_ls *ls, const void *name, int len,
struct dlm_rsb **r_ret)
{
struct dlm_rsb *r;
@@ -412,7 +412,8 @@ static int get_rsb_struct(struct dlm_ls *ls, char *name, int len,
count = ls->ls_new_rsb_count;
spin_unlock(&ls->ls_new_rsb_spin);
log_debug(ls, "find_rsb retry %d %d %s",
- count, dlm_config.ci_new_rsb_count, name);
+ count, dlm_config.ci_new_rsb_count,
+ (const char *)name);
return -EAGAIN;
}
@@ -448,7 +449,7 @@ static int rsb_cmp(struct dlm_rsb *r, const char *name, int nlen)
return memcmp(r->res_name, maxname, DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN);
}
-int dlm_search_rsb_tree(struct rb_root *tree, char *name, int len,
+int dlm_search_rsb_tree(struct rb_root *tree, const void *name, int len,
struct dlm_rsb **r_ret)
{
struct rb_node *node = tree->rb_node;
@@ -546,7 +547,7 @@ static int rsb_insert(struct dlm_rsb *rsb, struct rb_root *tree)
* while that rsb has a potentially stale master.)
*/
-static int find_rsb_dir(struct dlm_ls *ls, char *name, int len,
+static int find_rsb_dir(struct dlm_ls *ls, const void *name, int len,
uint32_t hash, uint32_t b,
int dir_nodeid, int from_nodeid,
unsigned int flags, struct dlm_rsb **r_ret)
@@ -724,7 +725,7 @@ static int find_rsb_dir(struct dlm_ls *ls, char *name, int len,
dlm_recover_locks) before we've made ourself master (in
dlm_recover_masters). */
-static int find_rsb_nodir(struct dlm_ls *ls, char *name, int len,
+static int find_rsb_nodir(struct dlm_ls *ls, const void *name, int len,
uint32_t hash, uint32_t b,
int dir_nodeid, int from_nodeid,
unsigned int flags, struct dlm_rsb **r_ret)
@@ -818,8 +819,9 @@ static int find_rsb_nodir(struct dlm_ls *ls, char *name, int len,
return error;
}
-static int find_rsb(struct dlm_ls *ls, char *name, int len, int from_nodeid,
- unsigned int flags, struct dlm_rsb **r_ret)
+static int find_rsb(struct dlm_ls *ls, const void *name, int len,
+ int from_nodeid, unsigned int flags,
+ struct dlm_rsb **r_ret)
{
uint32_t hash, b;
int dir_nodeid;
@@ -3320,8 +3322,9 @@ static int _cancel_lock(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
* request_lock(), convert_lock(), unlock_lock(), cancel_lock()
*/
-static int request_lock(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, char *name,
- int len, struct dlm_args *args)
+static int request_lock(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb,
+ const void *name, int len,
+ struct dlm_args *args)
{
struct dlm_rsb *r;
int error;
@@ -3420,7 +3423,7 @@ int dlm_lock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace,
int mode,
struct dlm_lksb *lksb,
uint32_t flags,
- void *name,
+ const void *name,
unsigned int namelen,
uint32_t parent_lkid,
void (*ast) (void *astarg),
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.h b/fs/dlm/lock.h
index a7b6474f009d..40c76b5544da 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.h
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.h
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static inline void dlm_adjust_timeouts(struct dlm_ls *ls) { }
int dlm_master_lookup(struct dlm_ls *ls, int nodeid, char *name, int len,
unsigned int flags, int *r_nodeid, int *result);
-int dlm_search_rsb_tree(struct rb_root *tree, char *name, int len,
+int dlm_search_rsb_tree(struct rb_root *tree, const void *name, int len,
struct dlm_rsb **r_ret);
void dlm_recover_purge(struct dlm_ls *ls);
diff --git a/include/linux/dlm.h b/include/linux/dlm.h
index f5f55c2138ae..c6bc2b5ee7e6 100644
--- a/include/linux/dlm.h
+++ b/include/linux/dlm.h
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ int dlm_lock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace,
int mode,
struct dlm_lksb *lksb,
uint32_t flags,
- void *name,
+ const void *name,
unsigned int namelen,
uint32_t parent_lkid,
void (*lockast) (void *astarg),
diff --git a/include/trace/events/dlm.h b/include/trace/events/dlm.h
index 18575206295f..da0eaae98fa3 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/dlm.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/dlm.h
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
/* note: we begin tracing dlm_lock_start() only if ls and lkb are found */
TRACE_EVENT(dlm_lock_start,
- TP_PROTO(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, void *name,
+ TP_PROTO(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, const void *name,
unsigned int namelen, int mode, __u32 flags),
TP_ARGS(ls, lkb, name, namelen, mode, flags),
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(dlm_lock_start,
TRACE_EVENT(dlm_lock_end,
- TP_PROTO(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, void *name,
+ TP_PROTO(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, const void *name,
unsigned int namelen, int mode, __u32 flags, int error,
bool kernel_lock),
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-15 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-15 19:43 [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 00/16] fs: dlm: fixes, cleanups and locktorture Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 01/16] fs: dlm: fix race in lowcomms Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 02/16] fs: dlm: fix race between test_bit() and queue_work() Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 03/16] fs: dlm: handle -EBUSY as first for lock validation Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 04/16] fs: dlm: handle -EBUSY as first for unlock validation Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 05/16] fs: dlm: use __func__ for function name Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 06/16] fs: dlm: handle -EINVAL as log_error() Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 07/16] fs: dlm: fix invalid derefence of sb_lvbptr Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 08/16] fs: dlm: allow lockspaces have zero lvblen Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 09/16] fs: dlm: handle rcom in else if branch Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 10/16] fs: dlm: remove dlm_del_ast prototype Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 11/16] fs: dlm: change ls_clear_proc_locks to spinlock Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 12/16] fs: dlm: trace user space callbacks Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 13/16] fs: dlm: move DLM_LSFL_FS out of uapi Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 14/16] fs: dlm: LSFL_CB_DELAY only for kernel lockspaces Alexander Aring
2022-08-15 19:43 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
2022-08-15 19:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [RESEND dlm/next 16/16] fs: dlm: initial commit of locktorture Alexander Aring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220815194328.2208580-16-aahringo@redhat.com \
--to=aahringo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).