cluster-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] gfs2: Check sb_bsize_shift after reading superblock
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:22:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220817122200.200359-1-anprice@redhat.com> (raw)

Fuzzers like to scribble over sb_bsize_shift but in reality it's very
unlikely that this field would be corrupted on its own. Nevertheless it
should be checked to avoid the possibility of messy mount errors due to
bad calculations. It's always a fixed value based on the block size so
we can just check that it's the expected value.

Tested with:

    mkfs.gfs2 -O -p lock_nolock /dev/vdb
    for i in 0 -1 64 65 32 33; do
        gfs2_edit -p sb field sb_bsize_shift $i /dev/vdb
        mount /dev/vdb /mnt/test && umount /mnt/test
    done

Before this patch we get a withdraw after

[   76.413681] gfs2: fsid=loop0.0: fatal: invalid metadata block
[   76.413681]   bh = 19 (type: exp=5, found=4)
[   76.413681]   function = gfs2_meta_buffer, file = fs/gfs2/meta_io.c, line = 492

and with UBSAN configured we also get complaints like

[   76.373395] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c:295:19
[   76.373815] shift exponent 4294967287 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'

After the patch, these complaints don't appear, mount fails immediately
and we get an explanation in dmesg.

Reported-by: syzbot+dcf33a7aae997956fe06 at syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com>
---
 fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
index 549879929c84..692e27f8f563 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
@@ -178,7 +178,10 @@ static int gfs2_check_sb(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, int silent)
 		pr_warn("Invalid block size\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-
+	if (sb->sb_bsize_shift != ffs(sb->sb_bsize) - 1) {
+		pr_warn("Invalid block size shift\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.37.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-08-17 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-17 12:22 Andrew Price [this message]
2022-09-20 12:07 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] gfs2: Check sb_bsize_shift after reading superblock Andrew Price
2022-09-20 12:14 ` Andreas Gruenbacher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220817122200.200359-1-anprice@redhat.com \
    --to=anprice@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).