From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 v3 PATCH 3/3] gfs2: Clear flags when withdraw prevents xmote
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:32:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220818183238.121677-4-rpeterso@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220818183238.121677-1-rpeterso@redhat.com>
There are a couple places in function do_xmote where normal processing
is circumvented due to withdraws in progress. However, since we bypass
most of do_xmote() we bypass telling dlm to lock the dlm lock, which
means dlm will never respond with a completion callback. Since the
completion callback ordinarily clears GLF_LOCK, this patch changes
function do_xmote to handle those situations more gracefully so the
file system may be unmounted after withdraw.
A very similar situation happens with the GLF_DEMOTE_IN_PROGRESS flag,
which is cleared by function finish_xmote(). Since the withdraw causes
us to skip the majority of do_xmote, it therefore also skips the call
to finish_xmote() so the DEMOTE_IN_PROGRESS flag needs to be cleared
manually.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
---
fs/gfs2/glock.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
index 0ffe7d474cd5..8d84094555b3 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ typedef void (*glock_examiner) (struct gfs2_glock * gl);
static void do_xmote(struct gfs2_glock *gl, struct gfs2_holder *gh, unsigned int target);
static void __gfs2_glock_dq(struct gfs2_holder *gh);
+static void handle_callback(struct gfs2_glock *gl, unsigned int state,
+ unsigned long delay, bool remote);
static struct dentry *gfs2_root;
static struct workqueue_struct *glock_workqueue;
@@ -730,7 +732,8 @@ static bool is_system_glock(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
*
*/
-static void do_xmote(struct gfs2_glock *gl, struct gfs2_holder *gh, unsigned int target)
+static void do_xmote(struct gfs2_glock *gl, struct gfs2_holder *gh,
+ unsigned int target)
__releases(&gl->gl_lockref.lock)
__acquires(&gl->gl_lockref.lock)
{
@@ -741,7 +744,8 @@ __acquires(&gl->gl_lockref.lock)
if (target != LM_ST_UNLOCKED && glock_blocked_by_withdraw(gl) &&
gh && !(gh->gh_flags & LM_FLAG_NOEXP))
- return;
+ goto skip_inval;
+
lck_flags &= (LM_FLAG_TRY | LM_FLAG_TRY_1CB | LM_FLAG_NOEXP |
LM_FLAG_PRIORITY);
GLOCK_BUG_ON(gl, gl->gl_state == target);
@@ -826,6 +830,20 @@ __acquires(&gl->gl_lockref.lock)
(target != LM_ST_UNLOCKED ||
test_bit(SDF_WITHDRAW_RECOVERY, &sdp->sd_flags))) {
if (!is_system_glock(gl)) {
+ handle_callback(gl, LM_ST_UNLOCKED, 0, false); /* sets demote */
+ /*
+ * Ordinarily, we would call dlm and its callback would call
+ * finish_xmote, which would call state_change() to the new state.
+ * Since we withdrew, we won't call dlm, so call state_change
+ * manually, but to the UNLOCKED state we desire.
+ */
+ state_change(gl, LM_ST_UNLOCKED);
+ /*
+ * We skip telling dlm to do the locking, so we won't get a
+ * reply that would otherwise clear GLF_LOCK. So we clear it here.
+ */
+ clear_bit(GLF_LOCK, &gl->gl_flags);
+ clear_bit(GLF_DEMOTE_IN_PROGRESS, &gl->gl_flags);
gfs2_glock_queue_work(gl, GL_GLOCK_DFT_HOLD);
goto out;
} else {
--
2.37.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-18 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-18 18:32 [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 v3 PATCH 0/3] gfs2: Misc withdraw patches (version 3) Bob Peterson
2022-08-18 18:32 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 v3 PATCH 1/3] gfs2: Prevent double iput for journal on error Bob Peterson
2022-08-18 18:32 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 v3 PATCH 2/3] gfs2: Dequeue waiters when withdrawn Bob Peterson
2022-08-18 18:32 ` Bob Peterson [this message]
2022-08-25 15:59 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 v3 PATCH 0/3] gfs2: Misc withdraw patches (version 3) Andreas Gruenbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220818183238.121677-4-rpeterso@redhat.com \
--to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).